---
title: "Hyundai vs Lina Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Lina Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-lina-energy"
---

# Hyundai vs Lina Energy

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 37 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | United Kingdom |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Lancaster |
| Founded | 2004 | 2017 |
| Employees | 206 | 28 |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 37 | +28 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 550 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 402 W | +40 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 22.37% | +1.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 20.32% | +1.17 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.352%/°C | +0.052 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 7 (19%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 6 (16.2%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 7 (18.9%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 18 (48.6%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 15 (40.5%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 4 (10.8%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 1 (2.7%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 13 (35.1%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 11 (29.7%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 8 (21.6%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 4 (10.8%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Lina Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating under the HD Hyundai group, traces its solar heritage to 1972, when Hyundai Heavy Industries began building its industrial energy base. Today it is a Fortune 500-backed manufacturer with over 1.4 GW of confirmed annual production capacity and BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning major financial institutions will underwrite projects that use its modules. Lina Energy is a considerably smaller and more recent entrant, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Bulgaria with additional branches in Jordan and China. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing has been confirmed for Lina Energy in publicly available sources. On institutional footprint and global recognition, Hyundai holds a clear advantage.

Hyundai's current lineup is built around N-type TOPCon and shingled-cell modules suited to both premium residential rooftops and utility-scale ground mounts. The company's in-house R&D laboratory carries accredited test status from UL and VDE, and its modules meet IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 certifications - credentials confirmed by recent supply agreements including a 455 MWdc project in Texas. Lina Energy covers a broader but less specialized range: monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and - in part of its catalog - TOPCon panels spanning roughly 280W to 550W, aimed at residential and light-commercial buyers. The company also offers EPC services, positioning itself more as an integrated regional solution provider than a high-volume module manufacturer.

For buyers who need bankability, long-term supply security, or utility-scale credibility, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the stronger default. Its Fortune 500 backing, confirmed Tier 1 status, and N-type TOPCon technology put it firmly in the upper segment of the global market. Lina Energy may appeal to cost-conscious buyers in Eastern Europe or the Middle East who value local presence and integrated project delivery, but its smaller scale and unconfirmed bankability make it a less suitable choice for larger financed installations.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - Cost, Ratings and Specs - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Technology Ltd. - Solar Panels Profile - ENF Solar \| article

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review (Cost, Ratings & Reviews)\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy)

\- \[Lina Energy Technology Ltd. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy)

\- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions - HD Hyundai\](https://www.hd.com/en/business/energy/hyundai-green/contents)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lina-energy)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-lina-energy)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-lina-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-lina-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.