---
title: "Hyundai vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-jolywood"
---

# Hyundai vs Jolywood

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 65 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Taizhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 2008 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 128 | +63 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 715 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 554 W | +111 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.60% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 22.54% | +1.05 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.016 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 110 (86%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (4.7%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions - operating today as HD Hyundai Energy Solutions - is a South Korean manufacturer with roots in the broader Hyundai industrial group and decades of experience in advanced components manufacturing. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and runs over 1.4 GW of annual production capacity across three dedicated cell and module factories in South Korea. Jolywood, headquartered in Taizhou, China, consistently appears on Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 lists, including the Q1 2025 edition, and carries a reported annual production capacity of approximately 10 GW - a scale considerably larger than Hyundai's. In terms of institutional footprint, Jolywood's production scale and financing track record give it broader global reach, while Hyundai carries the advantage of Korean-origin manufacturing, which appeals to markets sensitive to supply chain geography.

On product families, Hyundai Energy Solutions targets primarily the residential and small commercial rooftop segment. The company announced mass production of N-type TOPCon cells in April 2025, and prior product lines included bifacial panels suited to residential ground-mount systems. Jolywood has been one of the earliest pioneers of N-type technology globally and is notably one of the only major manufacturers that produces exclusively N-type panels - both TOPCon and HJT variants. Its NIWA residential series reaches confirmed module efficiency of up to 22.27%, and the company has announced panels exceeding 700 W for utility-scale applications, positioning it across both residential and large commercial or utility segments.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Jolywood represents a more technologically mature N-type choice with higher confirmed efficiencies and a substantially larger production base, while Hyundai Energy Solutions is a credible alternative for buyers in markets - particularly the United States - where Korean-origin supply chains carry procurement or financing advantages. Neither brand is clearly dominant for every use case; the better fit depends heavily on geography, project scale, and installer availability in the local market.

\---LINKS---

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025 \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/04/12/jolywood-claims-26-7-efficiency-for-n-type-topcon-solar-cell/ \| Jolywood claims 26.7% efficiency for n-type TOPCon solar cell \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/jolywood-solar-panel-review/ \| Jolywood Solar Panels - An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/jolywood/ \| Jolywood - 2025 Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard Top Performers \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.