---
title: "Hyundai vs Jinergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs Jinergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-jinergy"
---

# Hyundai vs Jinergy

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 10 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si |  |
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| Employees | 206 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |  |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 10 | +55 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 510 W | +130 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 478 W | +35 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 23.27% | +0.13 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 21.93% | +0.44 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 5 (50%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 2 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 2 (20.0%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 7 (70.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%)


| Technology | Hyundai | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 5 (50.0%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai's solar business operates under HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, headquartered in South Korea with a US arm based in Irvine, California, and the company draws on more than two decades of experience in solar technology and project deployment. It holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and runs roughly 1.4 GW of annual production capacity in South Korea, having begun mass production of N-type TOPCon cells in 2025 under a licensed IP arrangement that lets it export Korean-made cells into the US market. Jinergy, formally Jinneng Clean Energy Technology, is a China-based manufacturer that earned BNEF Tier 1 status as early as 2019 and built its reputation as one of the earliest large-scale producers of heterojunction (HJT) cells, having shipped over 6.5 GW of HJT and PERC modules to more than 30 countries by the end of 2020. Between the two, Hyundai carries the stronger institutional footprint in Western markets thanks to its US-based distribution and financing relationships, while Jinergy's bankability rests more on its early and sustained HJT manufacturing scale.

Hyundai's product range splits into the XG Series for standard residential rooftops (roughly 350-375 W), the bifacial YH Series aimed at residential and small commercial ground-mounted systems, and the higher-power DJ Series for commercial and industrial projects; overall efficiency sits in the high-19 to low-21 percent range, which is solidly average to above-average for the category. Jinergy's lineup centers on its JNHM bifacial HJT modules, which combine heterojunction cells with a low temperature coefficient and no LID or PID effects, positioning the brand toward higher-efficiency residential and commercial installations, including ground-mount and bifacial applications where the technology's edge in low-light and hot-climate performance is most valuable. Hyundai leans on conventional TOPCon and PERC-based production, while Jinergy's identity is built specifically around HJT as a premium, efficiency-focused technology.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice depends on priorities: Hyundai is the more conservative, easier-to-service option in North America and Europe given its established distribution network, standard 25-year product and performance warranties, and Tier 1 bankability recognized by lenders. Jinergy is a reasonable alternative for buyers specifically seeking HJT's efficiency and temperature-performance advantages, particularly in hotter climates or bifacial ground-mount projects, though its distribution and long-term local support outside China and its core export markets are less established. Neither brand is clearly superior across the board; the decision should hinge on whether local installer support or cell-technology performance is the higher priority.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025 \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review (Cost, Ratings & Reviews) \| review

\- https://solarbuildermag.com/news/bloomberg-bumps-jinergy-solar-modules-into-tier-1/ \| Bloomberg New Energy Finance bumps Jinergy solar modules into Tier 1 \| article

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/jinergy-solar-panels/ \| Jinergy Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings \| Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025: Updated Manufacturers & Rankings \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinergy)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinergy)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-jinergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.