---
title: "Hyundai vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hyundai vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Hyundai vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 65 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hyundai | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seongnam-si | Beijing |
| Founded | 2004 | 2005 |
| Employees | 206 | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity | 1.35 GW/year | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hyundai | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 65 | 504 | +439 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 740 W | +100 W |
| Avg Power | 442 W | 456 W | +14 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hyundai | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.80% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.49% | 21.13% | +0.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hyundai | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.022 |
| Bifacial Share | 43 (66%) | 238 (47%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.4 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hyundai | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (10.8%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (26.2%) | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (18.5%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 25 (38.5%) | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.2%) | 74 (14.7%) |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | Hyundai | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (12.3%) | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 49 (75.4%) | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (7.7%) | 120 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.6%) | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Hyundai | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 25 (38.5%) | 5 (1.0%) |
| PERC | 25 (38.5%) | 247 (49.0%) |
| Unknown | 9 (13.8%) | 16 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (9.2%) | 146 (29.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 90 (17.9%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean solar manufacturer that entered the photovoltaic sector in 2004 and was established as an independent entity within the HD Hyundai Group - a Fortune Global 500 conglomerate - in 2016. The company holds Tier 1 bankable manufacturer status and earned PVEL Top Performer recognition in 2025. Its annual production capacity exceeds 1.4 GW, which places it in a much smaller league than the leading Chinese manufacturers. Hyundai's panel portfolio spans N-Type TOPCon and HJT technologies, with module efficiencies cited by the company at up to around 23.2%. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Beijing, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world by shipment volume. It consistently appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list - confirmed for Q2 2025 - alongside LONGi, Jinko Solar, and Trina Solar. By end of 2024 JA Solar's combined wafer, cell, and module production capacity surpassed 100 GW, and the company shipped over 79 GW of modules during 2024, a year-on-year increase of nearly 40%. On institutional scale, geographic reach, and bankability, JA Solar holds a substantially stronger position.

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions targets residential rooftop installations and niche premium segments in Western markets including Europe, the United States, and Japan, where the non-Chinese brand identity is sometimes an explicit customer preference. Its current lineup is built primarily around N-Type TOPCon and HJT modules suited to space-constrained residential and light commercial rooftop applications. JA Solar's product range is broader: the DeepBlue 4.0 Pro series addresses residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount projects with N-type TOPCon bifacial modules reaching efficiencies up to around 23.3-23.4% depending on the variant. In early 2025 JA Solar introduced the DeepBlue 5.0, an N-type TOPCon module with a stated peak efficiency of up to 24.8%, targeting utility and commercial buyers, with mass production scheduled for Q4 2025.

For international buyers, the two brands are not directly interchangeable in market positioning. JA Solar is the more natural choice for utility-scale and C&I procurement where price, volume availability, and BloombergNEF bankability are the primary criteria. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions suits buyers and installers who need a credibly warranted, non-Chinese-branded product for markets where that distinction carries commercial or regulatory weight. Both offer long product and performance warranty terms in the 25-30 year range, and both use current-generation N-type cell technology, so the technology gap between them is narrow - the meaningful differences lie in scale, pricing, and brand perception.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hyundai vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Hyundai vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.