---
title: "HY SOLAR vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HY SOLAR vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# HY SOLAR vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 91 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 91 | 340 | +249 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 571 W | 520 W | +51 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.80% | 24.80% | +1.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.94% | 21.71% | +1.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.290%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 42 (46.2%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 49 (53.8%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 27 (29.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 18 (19.8%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 36 (39.6%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (11.0%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | HY SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 91 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, HY SOLAR


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-NT12/66H-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-NT12/66H-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-725) | 725 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-NT12/66H-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-720) | 720 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-NT12/66H-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-715) | 715 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT12/66H-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-710) | 710 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HY SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer operating under the legal name Hongyuan Green Energy Co., Ltd., founded in 2002 and publicly listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2018. The company has developed a vertically integrated production chain - covering silicon feedstock, wafers, cells, and finished modules - with manufacturing facilities spread across Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, and Anhui provinces. HY SOLAR states that its products reach close to 100 countries, but the brand has not appeared on publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 module bankability lists, which places it in a materially different institutional category from the global top tier. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is firmly established among the world's top three module manufacturers: it shipped approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024, has held BNEF Tier 1 status for seven consecutive years, and reports cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar leads by a considerable margin.

HY SOLAR's product catalog includes N-type modules under its HY-NT series, covering both standard residential formats and larger-format panels aimed at commercial applications - indicating a clear pivot toward higher-efficiency cell technology. The brand is typically positioned as a cost-competitive, vertically integrated supplier suited to installers who prioritize supply-chain control and price. Trina Solar's core offering is its Vertex N family, underpinned by the company's proprietary i-TOPCon Ultra technology. The range spans a 485 W panel for residential rooftops up to a 760 W large-format module achieving 24.5% efficiency for utility-scale ground-mounted arrays. The Vertex S+ G3 targets residential and light commercial segments, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra is designed for C&I and utility projects. Trina Solar has filed more than 700 patents and has already commenced the global rollout of its TOPCon 2.0 generation.

For most international buyers evaluating projects that require project financing or lender approval, Trina Solar is the cleaner default: its documented Tier 1 status, transparent shipment volumes, and established global service network reduce bankability friction. HY SOLAR can be a reasonable option for smaller, self-financed installations or price-sensitive markets where BNEF bankability is not a lender requirement, but buyers should independently verify warranty terms and regional after-sales coverage before committing.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HY SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [HY SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [HY SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.