---
title: "HY SOLAR vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HY SOLAR vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-q-cells"
---

# HY SOLAR vs Q-Cells

HY SOLAR has the broader catalog (91 vs 89 models). HY SOLAR leads on peak efficiency at 23.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website |  | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 91 | 89 | +2 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 675 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 571 W | 468 W | +103 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.80% | 23.20% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.94% | 21.21% | +1.73 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.290%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.035 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (100%) | 35 (39%) | +61 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 42 (46.2%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 49 (53.8%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |


## Power distribution

HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 27 (29.7%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 18 (19.8%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 36 (39.6%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (11.0%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | HY SOLAR | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 91 (100.0%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, HY SOLAR


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-NT12/66H-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-NT12/66H-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-725) | 725 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-NT12/66H-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-720) | 720 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-NT12/66H-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-715) | 715 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT12/66H-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-710) | 710 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HY SOLAR is a Chinese integrated PV manufacturer founded in 2002 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu. Listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2018, the company operates a vertically integrated supply chain spanning polysilicon, wafers, cells, and finished modules, with reported nameplate module capacity of approximately 26 GW. HY SOLAR has been recognized in the Global New Energy 500 and the Hurun China Top 100 Private Energy Companies, but does not appear prominently in BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability rankings based on available public sources. Q-Cells, now operating as Qcells under South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group, traces its roots to a German founding in 1999 and has become one of the most recognized module brands in Western markets, with module production capacity of approximately 12 GW and confirmed BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability status. Qcells was additionally named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company. On institutional footprint, Qcells holds a clear advantage with financiers and developers in North America and Europe.

HY SOLAR's catalog targets utility-scale and commercial segments, leveraging vertical integration from silicon production to finished modules to compete on cost in volume-driven tenders. Its global brand visibility outside China and certain export markets remains limited. Qcells, by contrast, has built its name primarily in premium residential rooftop installations across the United States, Europe, and Australia, while also serving commercial and utility projects. Its Q.ANTUM cell architecture, a passivated rear-contact technology building on PERC principles, defined the brand for years, and the current Q.TRON series adopts N-type TOPCon cells with efficiency ratings reaching up to 22.5%, backed by 25-year product warranties and strong degradation guarantees.

For a typical buyer in 2025 prioritizing bankability, warranty support, and installer availability in North American or European markets, Qcells is the stronger default. HY SOLAR can be price-competitive in large commercial or utility tenders, particularly in markets where it has an established footprint, but the limited third-party documentation of its Tier 1 status makes it a harder sell for lender-financed projects. The two brands are not interchangeable for residential buyers seeking long-term warranty recourse.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels: Complete Review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/ \| Q Cells achieves top tier bankability score - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/hy-solar \| Hongyuan Green Energy (HY Solar) manufacturer profile - ENF Solar \| article

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels: Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Q Cells achieves top tier bankability score - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

\- \[Hongyuan Green Energy (HY Solar) - ENF Solar profile\](https://www.enfsolar.com/hy-solar)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HY SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [HY SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [HY SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.