---
title: "HY SOLAR vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HY SOLAR vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# HY SOLAR vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 91 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website |  | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 91 | 637 | +546 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 571 W | 523 W | +49 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.80% | 24.80% | +1.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.94% | 22.18% | +0.76 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.290%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.014 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (100%) | 231 (36%) | +64 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 42 (46.2%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 49 (53.8%) | 184 (28.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |


## Power distribution

HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 27 (29.7%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 18 (19.8%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 36 (39.6%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (11.0%) | 18 (2.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | HY SOLAR | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 91 (100.0%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, HY SOLAR


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-NT12/66H-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-NT12/66H-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-725) | 725 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-NT12/66H-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-720) | 720 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-NT12/66H-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-715) | 715 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT12/66H-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-710) | 710 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HY Solar and Jinko Solar occupy very different positions in the global solar PV landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the largest module manufacturers in the world, listed on the NYSE with a reported module production capacity of 130 GW and over 33,800 employees. It holds Tier 1 bankable status - confirmed with a AAA rating in PV Tech's Q2 2025 bankability ranking - making it fully acceptable as a supplier for project-financed installations worldwide. HY Solar, by contrast, is a considerably smaller manufacturer with no Tier 1 designation and limited visibility in independent industry reviews and European market rankings. Both companies have converged on TOPCon as the leading cell technology, but while HY Solar's entire 91-model portfolio is built exclusively on TOPCon, Jinko's broader 545-model catalogue reflects only 39.5% TOPCon penetration, with the remainder spanning older P-type and other platforms.

From a pure specification standpoint, HY Solar's focused TOPCon-only lineup shows competitive numbers. Its average module efficiency of 22.94% exceeds Jinko's portfolio average of 22.0%, and its 100% bifacial rate compares favourably against Jinko's 31.9% bifacial share. HY Solar's average temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C is marginally better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, and its average product warranty of 30 years exceeds Jinko's 28.5-year average. Jinko, however, leads on peak power output (735 Wp vs 730 Wp) and peak efficiency (24.8% vs 23.8%), with cumulative Tiger Neo shipments surpassing 200 GW globally across 168 countries - a scale of deployment that provides meaningful real-world performance validation. For residential rooftop installs where a fully bifacial, high-efficiency TOPCon module with a long warranty is the priority, HY Solar presents a technically coherent option. For utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial C&I portfolios, or any installation requiring project finance, Jinko's Tier 1 status, global servicing network, and bankability are decisive advantages.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the decision hinges on risk tolerance and project type. Jinko Solar is the lower-risk, highly validated choice with proven bankability, a mature supply chain, and a track record exceeding 370 GW of cumulative global shipments. HY Solar may appeal to buyers seeking a fully bifacial, TOPCon-exclusive portfolio with a slightly better average efficiency and longer warranty commitment, but the absence of Tier 1 status and limited independent third-party review data warrant careful due diligence on the manufacturer's financial stability and local service capabilities before committing to a large deployment.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HY SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [HY SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [HY SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.