--- title: "HY SOLAR vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare HY SOLAR vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aeet" --- # HY SOLAR vs AEET HY SOLAR has the broader catalog (91 vs 5 models). HY SOLAR leads on peak efficiency at 23.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | HY SOLAR | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | | | Headquarters | | | | Founded | | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | HY SOLAR | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 91 | 5 | +86 | | Max Power | 730 W | 200 W | +530 W | | Avg Power | 571 W | 190 W | +381 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | HY SOLAR | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.80% | 15.70% | +8.10 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 22.94% | 14.90% | +8.04 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | HY SOLAR | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.290%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 91 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | HY SOLAR | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | 22-23% | 42 (46.2%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 49 (53.8%) | 0 | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Power distribution HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup) | Power band | HY SOLAR | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 27 (29.7%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 18 (19.8%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 36 (39.6%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 10 (11.0%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | HY SOLAR | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 91 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, HY SOLAR | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HY-NT12/66H-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HY-NT12/66H-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-725) | 725 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HY-NT12/66H-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-720) | 720 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HY-NT12/66H-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-715) | 715 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HY-NT12/66H-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66h-710) | 710 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HY-NT12/66GDF-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/hy-solar-hy-nt12-66gdf-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesale partner rather than a large-scale module manufacturer in the conventional sense. The company operates primarily as a distributor and reseller, sourcing panels from major producers for European and other markets. Publicly available Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 data for AEET specifically are limited, consistent with its position as a distribution-focused entity rather than a globally ranked module house. HY SOLAR, by contrast, operates under Chinese-listed Hongyuan Green Energy (Shanghai Stock Exchange: 603185), founded in 2002. The company controls a vertically integrated supply chain spanning metallurgical silicon, polysilicon, wafers, cells, and finished modules, and reportedly delivered more than 45 GW of photovoltaic products in 2024 alone. By sheer scale and institutional footprint, HY SOLAR holds the stronger position by a wide margin. On the product side, AEET's catalog - based on publicly available datasheets in industry directories - has historically included standard mono and polycrystalline panels suited to residential rooftop and small commercial installations, with older wattage classes visible. Whether AEET has since introduced N-type or TOPCon lines is not confirmed by current search results. HY SOLAR, by contrast, has confirmed N-type TOPCon bifacial modules across multiple power classes, with series running from roughly 445 W up to 635 W and beyond, and specialist variants designed for marine applications. Its TOPCon modules were rated "Very Good" with 91 points in an independent pv magazine evaluation, providing credible third-party performance validation. For buyers engaged in commercial or utility-scale procurement in 2025, HY SOLAR is the more defensible choice given its integrated supply chain, confirmed N-type TOPCon technology, and documented delivery scale. AEET may suit European buyers seeking distributor-level flexibility and local support for smaller residential projects, but the gap in documented manufacturing depth and global bankability between the two is substantial. \---LINKS--- \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar Panel Directory \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/hy-solar \| Hongyuan Green Energy (HY SOLAR) - ENF Solar Directory \| article \- https://www.energytrend.com/news/20260305-51028.html \| Hongyuan Secures Major Domestic and Overseas Solar Module Orders \| article Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[Hongyuan Green Energy (HY SOLAR) - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/hy-solar) \- \[Hongyuan Secures Major Solar Module Orders - EnergyTrend\](https://www.energytrend.com/news/20260305-51028.html) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [HY SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [HY SOLAR vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [HY SOLAR vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/hy-solar-vs-aeet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.