---
title: "Huayao vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huayao vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Huayao vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 126 models). Huayao leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huayao | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huayao | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 340 | +214 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 561 W | 520 W | +41 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huayao | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.94% | 21.71% | +0.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huayao | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 93 (74%) | 145 (43%) | +31 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.2 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huayao | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 21 (16.7%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 29 (23.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (31.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 33 (26.2%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | Huayao | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (4.8%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 37 (29.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (15.1%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 54 (42.9%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (7.9%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (44%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Huayao | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 56 (44.4%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 45 (35.7%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Back Contact | 19 (15.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (4.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Huayao


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY730-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy730-h132cdd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY725-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy725-h132cdd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY720-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy720-h132cdd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY715-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-n132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY715-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-h132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY710-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-n132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY710-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-h132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY705-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-h132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY705-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-n132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY700-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy700-n132cdd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Huayao Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2019 and headquartered in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, with a dedicated cell and module production subsidiary in Changzhou established in 2021. The company scaled aggressively, reaching a reported annual capacity of approximately 20 GW spanning wafers, cells, and modules, and is listed among Tier 1 manufacturers by ENF Solar for Q1 2025. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and also based in Changzhou, Jiangsu, ranks among the most established photovoltaic producers in the world, having recorded cumulative global shipments exceeding 205 GW and targeting module manufacturing capacity above 120 GW by end-2025. Trina Solar holds consecutive BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition, including Q1 2025, and with nearly three decades of operating history and deep ties to international project finance, its institutional footprint is substantially stronger than Huayao's.

Huayao's catalog spans monocrystalline PERC-based modules alongside n-type panels, including bifacial glass-on-glass formats reaching up to 730 Wp. The company has secured meaningful utility-scale procurement with major Chinese state energy groups, suggesting its commercial focus lies primarily with ground-mount farms and large commercial rooftops rather than distributed residential markets. Trina Solar structures its offering around the Vertex product families - the Vertex N line, anchored by the latest i-TOPCon Ultra modules at up to 760 W and 24.5% efficiency, targets utility-scale ground-mount projects, while the Vertex S+ G3 serves residential and C&I rooftop buyers in the 465 W to 495 W range. Both families rely on TOPCon cell technology, and Trina's large-scale TOPCon 2.0 rollout positions it among the frontrunners in next-generation module efficiency.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice - its warranty infrastructure, global distributor network, and long project-finance track record are considerably more mature than Huayao's. Huayao is nonetheless a credible option for large utility procurement where price competitiveness and confirmed 20 GW manufacturing capacity outweigh the value of brand depth. For residential or smaller C&I applications where long-term local service support matters most, Trina Solar's multi-decade advantage over a manufacturer with fewer than six years of history remains meaningful.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Huayao vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Huayao vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Huayao vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.