---
title: "Huayao vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huayao vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-seraphim"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/huayao/seraphim.png"
---

# Huayao vs Seraphim

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 126 models). Huayao leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huayao | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 2011 |
| Employees |  | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huayao | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 160 | +34 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 730 W |  |
| Avg Power | 561 W | 549 W | +12 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huayao | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.50% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.94% | 21.82% | +0.12 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huayao | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.010 |
| Bifacial Share | 93 (74%) | 111 (69%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.2 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huayao | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 21 (16.7%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 29 (23.0%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (31.0%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 33 (26.2%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | Huayao | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (4.8%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 37 (29.4%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (15.1%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 54 (42.9%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (7.9%) | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (44%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (52%)


| Technology | Huayao | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 56 (44.4%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| PERC | 45 (35.7%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| Back Contact | 19 (15.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (4.8%) | 6 (3.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 4 (2.5%) |


## Top panels, Huayao


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY730-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy730-h132cdd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY725-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy725-h132cdd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY720-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy720-h132cdd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY715-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-n132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY715-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-h132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY710-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-n132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY710-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-h132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY705-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-h132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY705-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-n132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY700-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy700-n132cdd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Huayao vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [Huayao vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [Huayao vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.