---
title: "Huayao vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huayao vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-q-cells"
---

# Huayao vs Q-Cells

Huayao has the broader catalog (126 vs 89 models). Huayao leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Huayao leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huayao | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website |  | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huayao | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 89 | +37 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 675 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 561 W | 468 W | +93 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huayao | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.94% | 21.21% | +0.73 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huayao | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 93 (74%) | 35 (39%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.2 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huayao | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 21 (16.7%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 29 (23.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (31.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 33 (26.2%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | Huayao | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (4.8%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 37 (29.4%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (15.1%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 54 (42.9%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (7.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (44%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Huayao | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 56 (44.4%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 45 (35.7%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| Back Contact | 19 (15.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (4.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Huayao


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY730-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy730-h132cdd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY725-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy725-h132cdd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY720-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy720-h132cdd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY715-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-n132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY715-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-h132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY710-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-n132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY710-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-h132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY705-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-h132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY705-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-n132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY700-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy700-n132cdd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Huayao Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Inner Mongolia, with a major module production facility in Changzhou. Founded as a vertically integrated producer covering silicon wafers through finished modules, Huayao has scaled rapidly and is reported to operate roughly 20 GW of annual module production capacity. The company has participated in large state-owned utility tenders in China - notably being selected for Huaneng Group's 10 GW module procurement concluded in early 2024 - but it does not appear on published BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists as of 2025, making it less familiar to international project financiers. Q-Cells, by contrast, was founded in Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany in 1999 and was acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012; it now operates under the Hanwha Q CELLS brand with headquarters in Seoul and engineering roots still in Germany. Q-Cells holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates what is widely described as the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia, with combined US capacity of roughly 8.4 GW per year. Q-Cells carries the stronger institutional footprint for Western project finance and residential markets.

On the product side, Huayao's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon modules - its Hyper series is reported to reach up to approximately 620 W - offered primarily in bifacial configurations suited to utility-scale ground mounts and large commercial rooftops. Q-Cells serves a broader range through its Q.ANTUM PERC and Q.ANTUM NEO TOPCon lines, covering premium residential rooftops, commercial flat-roofs, and utility projects alike, with efficiency ratings from around 20% up to roughly 22.5% or above in its highest-output models and temperature coefficients as low as -0.29%/°C that give it a documented edge in hot climates.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the clearer default choice. Its Tier 1 bankability status eases project financing, its US-based manufacturing offers supply-chain resilience and potential trade-policy advantages, and its 25-year product warranty is well established in the market. Huayao can be a competitive option for cost-sensitive utility procurement in Asia, but its limited track record in Western markets and absence from major Tier 1 lists make it a less straightforward pick for buyers who require lender-ready bankability.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - Cost, Efficiency and Performance \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/03/05/chinese-pv-industry-brief-huaneng-buys-0-12-w-modules-in-10-gw-tender/ \| Chinese PV Industry Brief - Huaneng 10 GW tender module suppliers \| article

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology - March 2026 \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Huayao vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Huayao vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Huayao vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.