---
title: "Huayao vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huayao vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-jolywood"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/huayao/jolywood.png"
---

# Huayao vs Jolywood

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 126 models). Huayao leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huayao | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Taizhou |
| Founded |  | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website |  | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huayao | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 128 | +2 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 715 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 561 W | 554 W | +7 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huayao | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.60% | +1.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.94% | 22.54% | +0.60 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huayao | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.022 |
| Bifacial Share | 93 (74%) | 110 (86%) | +12 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.2 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huayao | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 21 (16.7%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 29 (23.0%) | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (31.0%) | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 33 (26.2%) | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | Huayao | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (4.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 37 (29.4%) | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (15.1%) | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 54 (42.9%) | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (7.9%) | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (44%)

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (95%)


| Technology | Huayao | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 56 (44.4%) | 122 (95.3%) |
| PERC | 45 (35.7%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 19 (15.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (4.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (4.7%) |


## Top panels, Huayao


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY730-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy730-h132cdd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY725-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy725-h132cdd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY720-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy720-h132cdd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY715-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-n132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY715-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-h132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY710-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-n132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY710-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-h132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY705-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-h132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY705-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-n132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY700-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy700-n132cdd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Huayao vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [Huayao vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [Huayao vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.