---
title: "Huayao vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huayao vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Huayao vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 126 models). Huayao leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huayao | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Beijing |
| Founded |  | 2005 |
| Employees |  | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity |  | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website |  | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huayao | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 504 | +378 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 561 W | 456 W | +105 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huayao | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.94% | 21.13% | +0.81 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huayao | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.015 |
| Bifacial Share | 93 (74%) | 238 (47%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.2 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huayao | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 20-21% | 21 (16.7%) | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 29 (23.0%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (31.0%) | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 33 (26.2%) | 74 (14.7%) |


## Power distribution

Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)


| Power band | Huayao | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (4.8%) | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 37 (29.4%) | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (15.1%) | 120 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 54 (42.9%) | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (7.9%) | 9 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (44%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Huayao | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 56 (44.4%) | 146 (29.0%) |
| PERC | 45 (35.7%) | 247 (49.0%) |
| Back Contact | 19 (15.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (4.8%) | 5 (1.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 90 (17.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 16 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Huayao


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY730-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy730-h132cdd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY725-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy725-h132cdd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY720-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy720-h132cdd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY715-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-n132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY715-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy715-h132cdd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY710-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-n132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY710-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy710-h132cdd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY705-H132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-h132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY705-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy705-n132cdd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY700-N132CDD](https://comparepv.com/panel/huayao-hy700-n132cdd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JA Solar and Huayao represent two very different tiers of the global solar manufacturing landscape. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, employs over 37,000 people, and operates with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW - making it one of the top solar module manufacturers in the world with commercial reach spanning more than 100 countries. It holds Tier 1 bankable status, which is a critical credential for project financing. Huayao, by contrast, is a considerably smaller and less-established manufacturer, lacking Tier 1 certification and offering a portfolio of 126 panel models versus JA Solar's 524. Despite its smaller footprint, Huayao shows some notable technical strengths: a higher average module efficiency of 21.94% compared to JA Solar's 20.87%, a better average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.306%/°C versus -0.323%/°C, and a maximum panel output of 730 Wp against JA Solar's 740 Wp.

In terms of technology and use cases, the two manufacturers diverge further. JA Solar's portfolio is predominantly PERC-based (52.1% of models), though the company has been actively expanding its TOPCon lineup under the Deep Blue 4.0 series. Its vast product range and bankable status make it the go-to choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where lender approval depends on manufacturer credibility. Huayao leans more heavily toward TOPCon cells (44.4% of its portfolio) and stands out with a bifacial panel share of 73.8% - well above JA Solar's 44.3% - and an average warranty period of 29.2 years versus 27.9 years for JA Solar. These characteristics position Huayao well for space-constrained residential rooftop installations and smaller bifacial ground-mount systems where efficiency density and lower thermal losses matter most.

For international buyers choosing between the two, JA Solar is the lower-risk option for any project requiring bankability, long-term supply security, or access to a global service network. Huayao may appeal to technically sophisticated buyers seeking higher average efficiency and a stronger bifacial offering at potentially competitive pricing, provided they are comfortable with a manufacturer that carries less brand recognition and no Tier 1 designation.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Huayao vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Huayao vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Huayao vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huayao-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.