---
title: "Huawei vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huawei vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huawei-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Huawei vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huawei | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen, Guangdong | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1987 | 2006 |
| Employees | 208,000 | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.huawei.com](https://www.huawei.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese multinational technology corporation that manufactures telecommunications equipment, consumer electronics, electric vehicle autonomous driving systems, and rooftop solar power products. Founded in 1987, Huawei has grown to become a global leader in ICT solutions. The company...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huawei | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huawei | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huawei | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huawei | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Huawei | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Huawei | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Huawei and Jinko Solar are both Chinese companies holding Tier 1 bankable status, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the solar value chain and are not direct competitors in the same product category. Huawei, founded in 1987 and employing over 208,000 people globally, does not manufacture solar panels - it is the world's largest solar inverter maker, a title it has held for 10 consecutive years, with 176 GW of inverters shipped in 2024. Its solar portfolio centres on the SUN2000 hybrid inverter series and LUNA2000 battery storage systems, supported by the FusionSolar monitoring platform. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is a pure-play module manufacturer and the global leader in PV module shipments, reaching approximately 41 GW in the first half of 2025 alone, backed by a stated annual production capacity of 130 GW. With 33,830 employees, Jinko is smaller by headcount but dominant specifically in module manufacturing, with broad reach across Europe, Asia, and the Americas.

Huawei's core strength lies in its integrated smart energy ecosystem: SUN2000 inverters deliver efficiency above 98%, partial optimizer deployment addresses shading cost-effectively, and plug-and-play compatibility with LUNA2000 batteries makes the platform a strong fit for residential rooftop installs where storage scalability is a priority. Jinko Solar, by contrast, covers the full module spectrum - its 545-model portfolio spans standard monofacial panels, bifacial modules representing roughly 32% of the lineup, and the flagship Tiger Neo TOPCon series. Panel efficiency peaks at 24.8%, average portfolio efficiency sits at approximately 22%, and the average temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C ensures stable output in warm climates. Backed by a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% verified in late 2025 and an average product warranty of around 28.5 years, Jinko modules are well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial C&I installations, and high-yield residential systems.

For international buyers, Huawei and Jinko Solar are more complementary than competing - one supplies the inverter and storage layer, the other the module layer, and both appear frequently in the same installations. Buyers selecting a solar panel supplier will find Jinko Solar's combination of Tier 1 status, TOPCon technology leadership, NYSE listing, max power output of 735 Wp, and 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer awards a well-rounded and competitive proposition. Those evaluating the inverter and storage side should assess Huawei's ecosystem carefully, while factoring in the company's recent withdrawal from certain regional residential markets - including the UK as of January 2026 - which may affect long-term local support availability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Huawei vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huawei-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Huawei vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huawei-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Huawei vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huawei-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huawei-vs-jinko-solar