---
title: "Huasun vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Huasun vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/huasun-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Huasun vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 126 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Huasun leans bifacial (90% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Huasun | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Xuancheng, Anhui | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2020 | 1997 |
| Employees | 2500+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 20 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 000790 |  |
| Website | [https://www.huasunsolar.com/](https://www.huasunsolar.com/) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Huasun Energy is a global leader in heterojunction (HJT) solar technology, specializing in the R&D and large-scale production of ultra-high-efficiency n-type HJT products. They cover the entire value chain from silicon ingots and wafers to HJT cells and modules, delivering cutting-edge solutions for the solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Huasun | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 126 | 340 | +214 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 520 W | +3 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Huasun | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.90% | 24.80% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.92% | 21.71% | +0.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Huasun | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.258%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.043 |
| Bifacial Share | 113 (90%) | 145 (43%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Huasun skews to higher efficiency: 30% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Huasun | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 12 (9.5%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 2 (1.6%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 9 (7.1%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 65 (51.6%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 38 (30.2%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Huasun | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 9 (7.1%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 46 (36.5%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 36 (28.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (13.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (14.3%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Huasun | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 94 (74.6%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 32 (25.4%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Huasun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HSN-210-B132DS730](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132ds730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS730S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-rs730s9-132gant) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HSN-210-B132DS725](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132ds725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS725S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-rs725s9-132gant) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HSN-210-B132DS720](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132ds720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HSN-210-B132DSU720](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132dsu720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RS720S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-rs720s9-132gant) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HSN-210-B132DS715](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132ds715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HSN-210-B132DSU715](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-hsn-210-b132dsu715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RS715S89-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/huasun-rs715s89-132gant) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Huasun (Anhui Huasun Energy Co., Ltd.) was founded in 2020 in Xuancheng, Anhui Province, China - a relative newcomer to large-scale solar manufacturing. Despite its youth, the company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q1 2023, described by industry media as "record time," and has maintained that standing continuously through Q1 2025. By the end of 2024, Huasun had reached 20 GW of combined cell and module production capacity, with plans to scale to 40 GW by end of 2025. Trina Solar, headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, has operated since 1997 and is firmly established among the top three solar manufacturers globally, with cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. Trina holds long-standing BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has earned 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer designations - a record that gives it a substantially deeper institutional footprint than Huasun.

Huasun is exclusively a heterojunction (HJT) manufacturer, having committed to this single cell architecture at scale since its founding. Its Himalaya module family includes panels that have achieved independently certified outputs above 750 W at module efficiencies of 24.5% and above, with mass-production cell efficiencies reported above 26%. Cumulative HJT shipments surpassed 10 GW by December 2024, including 6 GW delivered in 2024 alone and a 3 GW order secured in early 2025. Huasun panels are best suited to buyers who specifically want HJT advantages - high efficiency, low temperature coefficient, and strong low-light output - making them a natural fit for premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial projects. Trina Solar offers a broader, segment-spanning portfolio built around N-type TOPCon technology under its Vertex brand. The Vertex S+ G3 serves residential and C&I rooftop markets with modules reaching 485 W, while utility-scale ground-mount projects are addressed by the bifacial Vertex N series, with outputs exceeding 740 W and 30-year performance warranties on flagship lines.

For most international buyers - especially those financing utility-scale or large commercial projects - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, given its multi-decade track record, proven global supply chain, and consistent independent test results. Huasun is the more compelling option for buyers who specifically value HJT cell architecture and are comfortable working with a younger but fast-growing supplier. Its rapid Tier 1 recognition and accelerating shipment volumes suggest it is closing the institutional gap quickly, and in premium residential contexts where HJT characteristics matter most, the two brands are increasingly interchangeable on bankability grounds.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Huasun vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/huasun-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Huasun vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/huasun-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Huasun vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/huasun-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/huasun-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.