---
title: "HT-SAAE vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HT-SAAE vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-znshine"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/ht-saae/znshine.png"
---

# HT-SAAE vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 112 models). HT-SAAE leads on peak efficiency at 23.90%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | HT-SAAE | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Suqian |
| Founded | 1998 | 1988 |
| Employees | 500+ | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HT-SAAE | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 112 | 212 | +100 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 670 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 470 W | 535 W | +65 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HT-SAAE | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.90% | 22.83% | +1.07 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.47% | 21.35% | +0.88 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HT-SAAE | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 53 (47%) | 89 (42%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HT-SAAE skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HT-SAAE | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 30 (26.8%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (3.6%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (10.7%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (34.8%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 27 (24.1%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | HT-SAAE | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 30 (26.8%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (29.5%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 29 (25.9%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (14.3%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (3.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (79%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)


| Technology | HT-SAAE | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 88 (78.6%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 19 (17.0%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.5%) | 0 |


## Top panels, HT-SAAE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai and a subsidiary of the state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC). The company's photovoltaic heritage stretches back to the 1960s, when it developed solar cells for China's satellite program; commercial module production for civilian markets began around 2000. HT-SAAE holds Tier 1 status with BloombergNEF and operates production facilities including sites in Inner Mongolia and Turkey, with annual output estimated at approximately 1.5 GW. ZNShine (ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd.) is headquartered in Suqian, Jiangsu province, and entered the photovoltaic industry in 2006. It has maintained continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition since 2015 and has scaled to a combined annual capacity of approximately 12 GW across four manufacturing bases - three in China and one in Indonesia. By volume and institutional footprint, ZNShine is the larger and more widely financed of the two.

HT-SAAE's current lineup spans both P-type and N-type TOPCon modules, with the N-type range running from around 415 W to 585 W and confirmed efficiencies between roughly 21.2% and 22.6%. Product warranties extend to 25 years for P-type and 30 years for N-type series, which exceeds the industry standard and is a meaningful differentiator. Independent testing placed HT-SAAE modules on the PV Top Performers List across all seven test categories in 2024. The brand targets residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments. ZNShine built its reputation on monocrystalline half-cut PERC technology but has since expanded into N-type TOPCon modules - including a 600 W series - and bifacial designs. The company also incorporates a graphene-based coating on some cells, claimed to improve durability. ZNShine's geographic reach now includes an announced joint venture in India, broadening its presence across Asia-Pacific, Europe, and beyond.

For most international buyers - including project developers and EPCs evaluating bankable module suppliers - both brands are credible options with Tier 1 recognition and diversified product lines. ZNShine's significantly larger production scale and longer track record on the BNEF list make it somewhat easier to finance in project debt structures. HT-SAAE's stronger warranty terms and independently verified performance rankings give it a competitive edge for buyers prioritizing documented panel quality over sheer supplier scale. In practice the two brands are broadly interchangeable for standard utility or C&I applications, and the deciding factors will typically come down to local distributor availability, delivered price, and after-sales support terms.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HT-SAAE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [HT-SAAE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [HT-SAAE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.