---
title: "HT-SAAE vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HT-SAAE vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-yingli"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/ht-saae/yingli.png"
---

# HT-SAAE vs Yingli

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 112 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | HT-SAAE | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 1998 | 1998 |
| Employees | 500+ | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 112 | 196 | +84 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 735 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 470 W | 524 W | +54 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.90% | 24.10% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.47% | 21.28% | +0.81 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 53 (47%) | 112 (57%) | +10 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HT-SAAE skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HT-SAAE | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 30 (26.8%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (3.6%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (10.7%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (34.8%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 27 (24.1%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | HT-SAAE | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 30 (26.8%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (29.5%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 29 (25.9%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (14.3%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (3.6%) | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (79%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (32%)


| Technology | HT-SAAE | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 88 (78.6%) | 54 (27.6%) |
| PERC | 19 (17.0%) | 63 (32.1%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.5%) | 20 (10.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 59 (30.1%) |


## Top panels, HT-SAAE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HT-SAAE, whose full name is Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd., is a Chinese state-owned enterprise operating under the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), a major state aerospace conglomerate. Listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 1998, the company holds Tier 1 bankable status and carries an estimated annual production capacity of around 5 GW, having supplied more than 3 GW of PV products to global markets to date. Yingli Solar, headquartered in Baoding, Hebei province, was once the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume in 2013-2014 before a severe financial crisis and judicial restructuring process spanning roughly 2015 to 2020. The company has since regained Bloomberg Tier 1 status and rebuilt its manufacturing base to approximately 7 GW of annual capacity, supported in part by a newer facility in Tianjin. On institutional stability, HT-SAAE's uninterrupted state-owned structure gives it a modest but meaningful long-term ownership edge over Yingli, which is still completing its post-restructuring recovery.

HT-SAAE offers a broad product range spanning roughly 270 W to over 700 W, with TOPCon now the dominant cell technology alongside some legacy PERC lines. This breadth suits residential rooftop, commercial rooftop, and utility-scale ground-mount applications alike. Yingli has directed its recovery effort toward the Panda 3.0 N-type TOPCon series - modules exceeding 625 W with efficiency up to 22.8% - aimed primarily at large C&I and utility-scale buyers. Yingli's Panda 3.0 appeared on the Taiyangnews Top Solar Modules listings from late 2023 onward, and the brand ranked in PV Top Performers across five test categories in 2024, providing meaningful third-party validation of its headline specifications.

For most international buyers, both brands occupy a similar niche: mid-tier Chinese manufacturers with current or recently regained Tier 1 status and competitive N-type TOPCon portfolios. HT-SAAE's state-backed ownership and wider wattage range give it a slight advantage for buyers who prioritize long-term corporate continuity and format flexibility. Yingli is the stronger choice for high-volume utility and C&I buyers who need independently validated high-wattage modules. Where neither profile is a clear priority, the two brands are effectively interchangeable, and local distributor pricing, logistics support, and warranty terms should drive the final decision.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HT-SAAE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [HT-SAAE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [HT-SAAE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.