---
title: "HT-SAAE vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HT-SAAE vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-trina-solar"
---

# HT-SAAE vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 112 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1998 | 1997 |
| Employees | 500+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH |  |
| Website | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 112 | 340 | +228 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 470 W | 520 W | +50 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.90% | 24.80% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.47% | 21.71% | +1.25 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.020 |
| Bifacial Share | 53 (47%) | 145 (43%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HT-SAAE skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 30 (26.8%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (3.6%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (10.7%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 39 (34.8%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 27 (24.1%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 30 (26.8%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (29.5%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 29 (25.9%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (14.3%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (3.6%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (79%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | HT-SAAE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 88 (78.6%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 19 (17.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.5%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, HT-SAAE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 1998, and ultimately backed by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), a state-owned enterprise. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and has supplied over 3 GW of PV products globally to date, with an annual module production capacity of around 2 GW. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, operates on a fundamentally different scale - it shipped 65.21 GW of modules in 2023 and recorded 34 GW in H1 2024 alone, with module production capacity exceeding 95 GW. Trina has achieved a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF on eight separate occasions and reaffirmed Tier 1 status in Q2 2025 under the stricter eligibility criteria BNEF introduced that quarter, raising the qualifying project threshold from 5 MW to 10 MW. In terms of institutional footprint, Trina Solar operates in a different league entirely.

HT-SAAE's portfolio spans both P-type and N-type modules ranging from roughly 395 W to 670 W, and the company has been named a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer five years in a row - a noteworthy result for a manufacturer of its scale that reflects consistent quality control rooted in its aerospace industrial heritage. HT-SAAE panels are typically deployed in residential rooftop and small commercial installations, where state-backed financial stability and a credible engineering pedigree make a persuasive case. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex N series is built on i-TOPCon cell technology and exceeded 720 W in serial production, with a 760 W variant at 24.5% efficiency launched for utility-scale deployment in 2025. Trina was also the first manufacturer globally to receive a TUV Rheinland AA rating for PV supply chain traceability, covering all stages from polysilicon to module, and has been recognized as a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. Its portfolio addresses residential, commercial, and large-scale ground-mount markets across all major geographies.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice: its shipment scale, supply chain depth, sustained bankability record, and advanced TOPCon product pipeline make financing and specification straightforward for projects of any size. HT-SAAE is a legitimate Tier 1 option worth shortlisting for smaller procurements, price-sensitive P-type applications, or projects where CASC state ownership provides additional institutional comfort. The two brands are not interchangeable in global reach or product breadth, but both carry sufficient independent certification that a residential or small commercial buyer would be well-served by either.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HT-SAAE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [HT-SAAE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [HT-SAAE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.