--- title: "HT-SAAE vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare HT-SAAE vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-runergy" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/ht-saae/runergy.png" --- # HT-SAAE vs Runergy Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 112 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | HT-SAAE | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | | Founded | 1998 | 2013 | | Employees | 500+ | 15,000 | | Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH | | | Website | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and... Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | HT-SAAE | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 112 | 124 | +12 | | Max Power | 715 W | 740 W | +25 W | | Avg Power | 470 W | 579 W | +109 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | HT-SAAE | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.90% | 24.10% | +0.20 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 20.47% | 22.42% | +1.95 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | HT-SAAE | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.322%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.023 | | Bifacial Share | 53 (47%) | 95 (77%) | +29 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | HT-SAAE | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 30 (26.8%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 4 (3.6%) | 9 (7.3%) | | 21-22% | 12 (10.7%) | 26 (21.0%) | | 22-23% | 39 (34.8%) | 48 (38.7%) | | 23%+ | 27 (24.1%) | 41 (33.1%) | ## Power distribution Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup) | Power band | HT-SAAE | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 30 (26.8%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 33 (29.5%) | 36 (29.0%) | | 500-599W | 29 (25.9%) | 28 (22.6%) | | 600-699W | 16 (14.3%) | 35 (28.2%) | | 700W+ | 4 (3.6%) | 25 (20.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (79%) Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%) | Technology | HT-SAAE | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 88 (78.6%) | 0 | | PERC | 19 (17.0%) | 32 (25.8%) | | Unknown | 5 (4.5%) | 0 | | N-type | 0 | 74 (59.7%) | | HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) | ## Top panels, HT-SAAE | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Runergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary HT-SAAE is a Chinese manufacturer, part of Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd., a state-linked industrial group with roots tracing back to China's aerospace sector, which gives the brand an unusually long industrial pedigree for the solar space. It has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for multiple years running and has also been named a "Best Performing Manufacturer" by PV Evolution Labs (PVEL) since 2018. Its production scale is comparatively modest, with reported annual capacity around 5 GW for the core Chinese operation plus a smaller Turkish facility of about 2 GW. Runergy, also based in China (Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.), is a younger but faster-growing company that has secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters and carries a BB bankability rating from the PV ModuleTech report. Runergy operates at a much larger industrial scale, with roughly 23 GW of module capacity and around 63 GW of cell capacity, plus a new 2 GW module plant in Alabama, USA, giving it the stronger institutional and manufacturing footprint of the two. On product lines, HT-SAAE offers both PERC panels (such as the HT72-166M transparent series) and newer N-type TOPCon bifacial double-glass modules (the HT54-18X series), generally positioned for residential and commercial rooftop installations with voltage ratings suited to 600V residential and 1000-1500V commercial systems. Runergy has made TOPCon its primary technology focus, with cell efficiencies independently verified by Fraunhofer ISE reaching as high as 26.9 percent, and offers a clearer split between product lines: an all-black 440-455W TOPCon module for residential rooftops and separate 580W and 625W, plus a newer 660-670W TOPCon 3.0 series, aimed squarely at utility-scale ground-mount projects. For a typical residential or small commercial buyer in 2025, both brands are credible Tier 1 options with legitimate TOPCon technology, so the choice often comes down to distributor availability and pricing rather than a clear technology gap. Buyers prioritizing large-scale utility projects or US-based manufacturing (for domestic content incentives) may lean toward Runergy given its scale and Alabama facility, while HT-SAAE's longer PVEL track record may appeal to buyers who weight long-term field reliability data more heavily. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/runergy-ranked-as-a-bloombergnef-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-301998949.html \| Runergy Ranked as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergy-commissions-2gw-alabama-module-production-plant/ \| Runergy commissions 2GW Alabama module production plant \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergys-topcon-3-0-solar-modules-25-9-conversion-efficiency/ \| Runergy's TOPCon 3.0 solar modules certified at 25.9% conversion efficiency \| article \- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/runergy-introduces-topcon-cell-with-269-conversion-efficiency \| Runergy Introduces TOPCon Cell With 26.9% Conversion Efficiency \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/33348 \| HT-SAAE panel datasheet overview \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [HT-SAAE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy) - [HT-SAAE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy) - [HT-SAAE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/ht-saae-vs-runergy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.