---
title: "Hiwatt Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hiwatt Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Hiwatt Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 109 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 109 | 340 | +231 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 476 W | 520 W | +44 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.60% | 21.71% | +1.12 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 14 (13%) | 145 (43%) | +30 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 27 (24.8%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 32 (29.4%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 27 (24.8%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 14 (12.8%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 9 (8.3%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 33 (30.3%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 30 (27.5%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (23.9%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (13.8%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (4.6%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (46%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Hiwatt Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 50 (45.9%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 33 (30.3%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 21 (19.3%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 5 (4.6%) | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Hiwatt Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HW-M12/132G-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HW-M12/132G-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HW-M12/132G-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HW-M12/132G-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HW-M12/132G-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HW-M12/132H-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HW-M12/132H-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HW-M12/132H-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HW-M12/132H-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HW-M12/132H-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hiwatt Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer founded in 2009, with production facilities in Jiangsu province. The company reports a manufacturing capacity of approximately 2.2 GW and operates as a mid-tier, export-oriented supplier. No confirmed presence on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists was identified in available sources. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, has grown into one of the world's largest solar manufacturers. Trina shipped approximately 65 GW of modules in 2023 and around 77 GW in 2024, ranking among the top three global suppliers. The company reaffirmed its BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in both Q1 and Q2 2025, earning a 100% bankability rating for the eighth time. On institutional credibility and financing access, the two companies belong to substantially different categories.

Hiwatt Solar's catalog includes bifacial half-cell double-glass modules, colour panels in the 300W-450W range, and higher-wattage products reaching 730W, addressing both residential rooftop and commercial segments. Detailed independent reviews of Hiwatt's modules are, however, sparse in major industry publications, which limits third-party validation. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series is built on N-type TOPCon cell technology with a multi-busbar design and covers the full project spectrum - from residential rooftop installations to commercial and industrial (C&I) and large-scale utility-scale ground-mount farms. Module efficiency ranges from around 19.2% to 22.5% on premium models, and the company has maintained Top Performer status in PVEL scorecard testing for 11 consecutive years.

For most buyers - whether a residential homeowner, a commercial developer, or a project financer working on utility-scale assets - Trina Solar is the considerably safer default choice. Its Tier 1 BNEF status, shipment volumes of tens of gigawatts per year, 30-year performance warranties on flagship products, and consistent PVEL recognition translate directly into bankable project financing and a well-documented operational track record. Hiwatt Solar may suit cost-sensitive buyers in markets with less stringent financing requirements, but the absence of confirmed Tier 1 status and limited independent review coverage mean buyers should conduct careful due diligence before committing to large-scale orders.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hiwatt Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Hiwatt Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Hiwatt Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.