---
title: "Hiwatt Solar vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hiwatt Solar vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Hiwatt Solar vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 109 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website |  | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 109 | 637 | +528 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 476 W | 523 W | +47 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.60% | 22.18% | +1.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.036 |
| Bifacial Share | 14 (13%) | 231 (36%) | +23 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 27 (24.8%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 32 (29.4%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 27 (24.8%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 14 (12.8%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 9 (8.3%) | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 33 (30.3%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 30 (27.5%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (23.9%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (13.8%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (4.6%) | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (46%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Hiwatt Solar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 50 (45.9%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| TOPCon | 33 (30.3%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| Unknown | 21 (19.3%) | 21 (3.3%) |
| N-type | 5 (4.6%) | 195 (30.6%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Hiwatt Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HW-M12/132G-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HW-M12/132G-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HW-M12/132G-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HW-M12/132G-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HW-M12/132G-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132g-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HW-M12/132H-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HW-M12/132H-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HW-M12/132H-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HW-M12/132H-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HW-M12/132H-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/hiwatt-solar-hw-m12-132h-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hiwatt Solar is a Chinese PV module manufacturer with a production capacity of approximately 2.2 GW and a portfolio of 109 panels built primarily around PERC cell technology, which accounts for roughly 46% of its lineup. The company does not carry Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its appeal for projects that require third-party financial validation from lenders. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and publicly listed on the NYSE, operates at a fundamentally different scale - it is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers with a production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,800 employees, and Tier 1 bankable status that has been maintained across multiple consecutive years. With 545 panels in its active portfolio and a global installation base exceeding 300 GW, Jinko has a depth of commercial track record that Hiwatt cannot match.

Hiwatt Solar's portfolio delivers a maximum panel output of 730 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 23.5%, with an average efficiency of 20.6% across its range. Its temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C and a modest bifacial share of approximately 12.8% point to a more conventional, cost-oriented offering well suited to standard residential rooftop installs where budget constraints take priority over maximum energy yield. Jinko Solar leads on virtually every technical metric: average module efficiency of 22.0%, maximum efficiency of 24.8%, a more favorable temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C, and a bifacial share approaching 32%. The strong presence of TOPCon technology - covering approximately 39% of its portfolio and underpinned by record-breaking cell efficiency milestones in independent testing - makes Jinko the preferred choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial C&I installations, and high-density residential systems. Its average warranty of approximately 28.5 years, compared to 25 years for Hiwatt, further strengthens its position in projects requiring long-term yield guarantees.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the more credible option across virtually all project types, backed by Tier 1 bankability, superior manufacturing scale, and a technically advanced TOPCon-led portfolio. Hiwatt Solar may serve as a cost-competitive alternative for smaller residential projects or price-sensitive markets where lender bankability requirements do not apply, but the gap in technology leadership, warranty terms, and market standing between the two manufacturers is substantial.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hiwatt Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Hiwatt Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Hiwatt Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hiwatt-solar-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.