---
title: "Heliene vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Heliene vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Heliene vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 91 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Heliene leans bifacial (65% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Heliene | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | China |
| Headquarters | Sault Ste. Marie | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2010 | 1997 |
| Employees | 200-600 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://heliene.com](https://heliene.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Heliene is a North American headquartered manufacturer of high-quality, competitively priced solar photovoltaic modules. They have manufacturing operations in the US and Canada, and a global supply chain capability. Heliene is committed to providing reliable and high-performing solar solutions for utility-scale...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Heliene | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 91 | 340 | +249 |
| Max Power | 710 W | 760 W | +50 W |
| Avg Power | 528 W | 520 W | +8 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Heliene | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.08% | 24.80% | +1.72 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.47% | 21.71% | +0.25 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Heliene | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.315%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.014 |
| Bifacial Share | 59 (65%) | 145 (43%) | +22 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Heliene | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (4.4%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (31.9%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 21 (23.1%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (38.5%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Heliene | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (11.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 22 (24.2%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 40 (44.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (17.6%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 3 (3.3%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Heliene | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 39 (42.9%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 27 (29.7%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| TOPCon | 20 (22.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 5 (5.5%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Heliene


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [132HC-710 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-710-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [132HC-705 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-705-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [132HC-700 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-700-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [132HC-695 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-695-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [132HC-690 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-690-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [156HC-645 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-645-m10-ntyp-sl) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [156HC-640 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-640-m10-ntyp-sl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [156HC-630 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-630-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Heliene is a Canadian solar manufacturer founded in 2009, headquartered in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, with production lines in Mountain Iron and Rogers, Minnesota, and Florida. Built initially with Ontario government loans and private investor backing, the company has grown into a Tier 1 bankable manufacturer with a firmly North American identity, reporting over 2 GWp of North American-made module shipments in 2024. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, by Gao Jifan, and has scaled into one of the world's largest PV manufacturers, holding a consistent position on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and reporting annual production capacity exceeding 80 GW as of 2025, with cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW. By any measure of institutional scale and global brand presence, Trina Solar is the significantly larger player.

Heliene's catalog spans modules from roughly 380 W to 710 W, reaching top-line efficiencies of up to 22.9%, and covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale segments. The company's defining competitive advantage is full IRA compliance - Heliene modules qualify buyers for the Domestic Content Adder under the Inflation Reduction Act, with domestic content reaching 66%, and the company benefits from the 45X production tax credit, making it a standout choice for US federal procurement and incentive-driven projects. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series is built on n-type i-TOPCon cell technology using 210mm large-format wafers, with modules exceeding 700 W and efficiency reaching around 22.5%. Trina has been named a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years and holds 30 world records in PV cell innovation, serving residential, commercial, and utility customers across more than 170 countries.

For buyers in the United States or Canada who require domestically manufactured modules - particularly for projects claiming IRA incentives - Heliene is a well-regarded and genuinely local option with a long track record in North America. For international buyers, including European and Polish commercial or utility developers, Trina Solar is the more practical default: its European headquarters in Zurich, confirmed active presence in Poland through its ISBU division, deep distribution network, and industry-leading production volume make sourcing straightforward and cost-competitive. The two brands are not interchangeable - they occupy largely non-overlapping geographies - and the right choice depends almost entirely on project location and the incentive frameworks in play.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Heliene vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Heliene vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Heliene vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.