---
title: "Heliene vs Solarspace - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Heliene vs Solarspace solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-solarspace"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/heliene/solarspace.png"
---

# Heliene vs Solarspace

Heliene has the broader catalog (91 vs 82 models). Solarspace leads on peak efficiency at 23.16%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Heliene | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | China |
| Headquarters | Sault Ste. Marie | Xuzhou |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
| Employees | 200-600 | 6000+ |
| Annual capacity | 1.3 GW/year | 60+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://heliene.com](https://heliene.com) | [https://solarspace.com](https://solarspace.com) |

Heliene is a North American headquartered manufacturer of high-quality, competitively priced solar photovoltaic modules. They have manufacturing operations in the US and Canada, and a global supply chain capability. Heliene is committed to providing reliable and high-performing solar solutions for utility-scale...

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Heliene | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 91 | 82 | +9 |
| Max Power | 710 W | 710 W |  |
| Avg Power | 528 W | 539 W | +11 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Heliene | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.08% | 23.16% | +0.08 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.47% | 22.04% | +0.57 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Heliene | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.315%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.016 |
| Bifacial Share | 59 (65%) | 76 (93%) | +28 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.6 yrs | +4.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Heliene | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (4.4%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (31.9%) | 7 (8.5%) |
| 21-22% | 21 (23.1%) | 26 (31.7%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (38.5%) | 46 (56.1%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 3 (3.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | Heliene | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (11.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 22 (24.2%) | 35 (42.7%) |
| 500-599W | 40 (44.0%) | 19 (23.2%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (17.6%) | 24 (29.3%) |
| 700W+ | 3 (3.3%) | 3 (3.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (43%)

Dominant cell tech: N-type (70%)


| Technology | Heliene | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 39 (42.9%) | 18 (22.0%) |
| N-type | 27 (29.7%) | 57 (69.5%) |
| TOPCon | 20 (22.0%) | 7 (8.5%) |
| HJT | 5 (5.5%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Heliene


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [132HC-710 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-710-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [132HC-705 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-705-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [132HC-700 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-700-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [132HC-695 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-695-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [132HC-690 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-690-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [156HC-645 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-645-m10-ntyp-sl) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [156HC-640 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-640-m10-ntyp-sl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [156HC-630 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-630-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarspace


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SS9-66HD-710N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-710n) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SS9-66HD-705N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-705n) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SS9-66HD-700N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-700n) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SS9-66HD-695N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-695n) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SS9-66HD-690N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-690n) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SS9-66HD-685N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-685n) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SS9-66HD-680N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-680n) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SS9-66HD-675N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-675n) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SS9-66HD-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SS9-66HD-670N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670n) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information now.

Heliene is a Canadian manufacturer headquartered in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, founded in 2010, with domestic manufacturing lines in Minnesota that bring its U.S. annual production capacity to roughly 1.3 GW, expanding toward 1.5 GW. It is widely recognized as a Tier 1 bankable supplier and has leaned heavily into North American content strategies, positioning itself to capture Inflation Reduction Act domestic content incentives. Solarspace, by contrast, was founded in China in 2011 and operates a much larger global footprint, with manufacturing bases in China, Cambodia and Laos and a reported capacity of around 60 GW of cells and 7.2 GW of modules, and it has likewise appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists in recent years. In terms of sheer production scale and geographic diversification, Solarspace has the stronger institutional footprint, while Heliene's advantage lies in its localized North American manufacturing base.

Product-wise, Heliene offers a broad catalog spanning PERC, TOPCon and N-type cells in the 380-710W range, with bifacial modules making up roughly two-thirds of its lineup, and it markets across residential, commercial and utility-scale segments with a uniform 25-year warranty. Solarspace covers a similarly wide power range of 400-720W with 20-23% efficiency and an even higher bifacial share, reportedly around 93% of its portfolio, backed by a 30-year power warranty in some markets, and it serves a global customer base through regional offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Middle East. Both companies therefore compete in overlapping segments, from premium bifacial rooftop systems to larger ground-mount installations, with Solarspace generally skewing toward higher-volume international distribution and Heliene toward North American projects seeking domestic content compliance.

For a typical 2025 buyer, the choice often comes down to project location and incentive eligibility rather than raw product quality: buyers pursuing U.S. domestic content bonuses or shorter supply chains are better served by Heliene, while international buyers prioritizing maximum bifacial gain and global supply scale may lean toward Solarspace. Both are credible Tier 1-recognized options, and in markets where domestic content is not a factor, the two brands are reasonably interchangeable on paper specifications.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/04/heliene-expands-solar-module-capacity-with-new-500-mw-minnesota-plant/ \| Heliene expands solar module capacity with new 500 MW Minnesota plant \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/heliene-opens-500mw-module-assembly-plant-minnesota/ \| Heliene opens 500MW module assembly plant in Minnesota \| article

\- http://pv-magazine-usa.com/2026/01/16/beyond-the-tariff-wall-how-heliene-is-navigating-the-2026-regulatory-pivot/ \| Beyond the tariff wall: How Heliene is navigating the regulatory pivot \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/heliene \| Are Heliene panels the best solar panels to buy? \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21665/heliene/ \| Heliene - Profile & Reviews \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Heliene vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarspace)
- [Heliene vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarspace)
- [Heliene vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarspace)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/heliene-vs-solarspace

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.