---
title: "HD Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare HD Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hd-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# HD Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 7 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. HD Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | HD Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | HD Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 7 | 340 | +333 |
| Max Power | 635 W | 760 W | +125 W |
| Avg Power | 620 W | 520 W | +100 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | HD Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.96% | 21.71% | +1.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | HD Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

HD Solar skews to higher efficiency: 57% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | HD Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 3 (42.9%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (57.1%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

HD Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | HD Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 7 (100.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | HD Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 7 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, HD Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HD-N-G12-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-635) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HD-N-G12-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-630) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HD-N-G12-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-625) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HD-N-G12-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HD-N-G12-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-615) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HD-N-G12-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-610) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HD-N-G12-605](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-solar-hd-n-g12-605) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HD Solar is a solar module brand with limited publicly available background information. Independent databases such as ComparePV list seven panel models in the 605 W to 635 W range, all based on n-type TOPCon cell technology and manufactured as bifacial modules. The company's country of origin and founding date are not confirmed by major industry sources, and the brand does not appear on any published BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, which suggests restricted institutional recognition and potentially narrower access to project financing. Trina Solar presents an entirely different profile: founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, it is one of the world's largest vertically integrated photovoltaic manufacturers, holding confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, with cumulative module shipments exceeding 292 GW and an annual production capacity above 50 GW across factories in China, Thailand, and Vietnam. In terms of institutional scale and market footprint, Trina Solar is in a separate league.

Based on available technical data, HD Solar appears to target the commercial and utility segment with high-wattage bifacial TOPCon modules suited to ground-mount and large rooftop applications. The claimed 30-year linear performance warranty is a positive headline figure, though it carries less weight from a manufacturer with an unverified track record. Trina Solar's product range is far more extensively documented: its Vertex N series, based on n-type i-TOPCon technology and reaching outputs above 720 W, is optimized for large-scale utility projects, while the Vertex S family serves residential and commercial rooftop markets. The company has achieved Top Performer recognition from PVEL for eleven consecutive years, providing strong third-party validation of real-world durability.

For most international buyers - whether a residential installer or a utility developer seeking bankable assets - Trina Solar is the clear default choice given its proven bankability, global service network, and decades-long delivery history. HD Solar may be considered as a cost-oriented alternative where price and local availability take priority and project financing does not require Tier 1 credentials, but the absence of verifiable institutional history is a genuine long-term risk that buyers should weigh carefully.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [HD Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hd-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [HD Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hd-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [HD Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hd-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hd-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.