---
title: "Hansol vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hansol vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-q-cells"
---

# Hansol vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 22 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hansol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Seoul |
| Founded | 1965 | 1999 |
| Employees | 11,000+ | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 0-1 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange (KRX): 004150 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.hansol.com](https://www.hansol.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hansol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 22 | 89 | +67 |
| Max Power | 360 W | 675 W | +315 W |
| Avg Power | 336 W | 468 W | +132 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hansol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 18.05% | 23.20% | +5.15 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 17.10% | 21.21% | +4.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hansol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.445%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.120 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +2.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hansol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (100.0%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Hansol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 22 (100.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Hansol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 22 (100.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, Hansol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TD-AN3](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TD-AN3-360](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TD-AN3 360W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360w) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TD-AN3-355](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TD-AN3 355W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355w) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TD-AN3-350](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TD-AN3 350W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350w) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TD-AN3-345](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TD-AN3 345W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345w) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TD-AN3-340](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-340) | 340 | 17.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hansol is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seoul, with roots in electronics and materials that date back decades and a solar module division launched around 2010. The company operates a production facility in Ochang, South Korea, with a reported capacity exceeding 600 MW annually - a comparatively modest scale that nonetheless earned it a place on Bloomberg's Tier 1 bankability list. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, originated as a German pioneer of PERC cell technology before being acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group; it now operates global module capacity exceeding 11 GW per year and has invested heavily in domestic US manufacturing, with its Georgia factories alone representing roughly 8.4 GW of planned capacity. Both carry Tier 1 status, but Q CELLS commands a significantly larger institutional footprint by virtually every measure of scale and market reach.

Hansol's catalog is oriented toward standard residential and small commercial rooftop installations, offering mono-crystalline modules in the 280-355 W range that appeal to cost-conscious buyers in Korea and select export markets. Q CELLS, under its Q.ANTUM branding, builds on PERC technology and targets the full spectrum from premium residential rooftops to utility-scale ground mounts; its product families are distributed widely across North America, Europe, and Australia, backed by 25-to-30-year performance warranties and a manufacturing footprint that includes US-made modules qualifying for domestic content incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.

For a typical residential or commercial buyer in 2025, Q CELLS is the stronger default choice - its combination of broad installer availability, Tier 1 bankability, mature warranty infrastructure, and verified Q.ANTUM performance data provides more confidence across more markets. Hansol remains a credible option for buyers specifically sourcing Korean-made panels or operating in markets where Hansol has established distribution, but it does not yet match Q CELLS in global reach or product breadth.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hansol/ \| Hansol Solar Panels overview and model list - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/hansol-technics \| Hansol Technics panels review - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline \| review

\- https://taiyangnews.info/business/hanwha-solutions-planning-8-4-gw-us-production-capacity \| Hanwha Solutions planning 8.4 GW US production capacity - TaiyangNews \| article

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 cost efficiency and performance - EcoWatch \| review

Sources:

\- \[Hansol Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hansol/)

\- \[Hansol Technics panels review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/hansol-technics)

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/)

\- \[Hanwha Solutions planning 8.4 GW US production capacity - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/business/hanwha-solutions-planning-8-4-gw-us-production-capacity)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hansol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Hansol vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Hansol vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.