---
title: "Hansol vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hansol vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-hyundai"
---

# Hansol vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 22 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hansol | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 1965 | 2004 |
| Employees | 11,000+ | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 0-1 GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | Korea Stock Exchange (KRX): 004150 | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.hansol.com](https://www.hansol.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hansol | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 22 | 65 | +43 |
| Max Power | 360 W | 640 W | +280 W |
| Avg Power | 336 W | 442 W | +106 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hansol | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 18.05% | 23.40% | +5.35 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 17.10% | 21.49% | +4.39 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hansol | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.445%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.144 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hansol | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (100.0%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Hansol | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 22 (100.0%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Hansol | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 22 (100.0%) | 9 (13.8%) |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) |


## Top panels, Hansol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TD-AN3](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TD-AN3-360](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TD-AN3 360W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360w) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TD-AN3-355](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TD-AN3 355W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355w) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TD-AN3-350](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TD-AN3 350W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350w) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TD-AN3-345](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TD-AN3 345W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345w) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TD-AN3-340](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-340) | 340 | 17.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hansol and Hyundai Energy Solutions (operating as HD Hyundai Energy Solutions) are both South Korean manufacturers with roots in large domestic conglomerates - Hansol Technics traces back to 1996 as a spin-off from the Hansol Group, which itself separated from Samsung in 1991, while Hyundai Energy Solutions is a subsidiary of HD Hyundai, the heavy-industry arm of the broader Hyundai conglomerate. Both companies hold Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status, meaning independent commercial banks are willing to finance projects built around their modules. Hyundai Energy Solutions reports annual production capacity exceeding 1.4 GW, a figure that has been confirmed in industry press; no comparable public capacity figure was found for Hansol, which suggests it operates at a meaningfully smaller scale and maintains a stronger domestic Korean focus. On institutional footprint, Hyundai Energy Solutions carries the broader international brand recognition and a more verifiable global supply chain.

In terms of product families, Hansol's publicly listed catalog on platforms such as EnergySage consists primarily of standard 60- and 72-cell modules in the 280W-355W output range, suited to residential rooftops and light commercial installations. No confirmed public announcement of a TOPCon or HJT transition was found for Hansol, so its cell technology at scale remains unconfirmed beyond earlier PERC-era product lines. Hyundai Energy Solutions, by contrast, confirmed mass production of N-type TOPCon cells beginning in 2025 and is actively developing HJT and perovskite-silicon tandem cells in partnership with the Korea Institute of Chemical Technology. Its current catalog spans premium residential panels to mid-size commercial arrays, with top-end modules reaching efficiencies above 23%.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more straightforward recommendation - it offers a confirmed technology roadmap, a larger and more transparent manufacturing base, stronger third-party test results, and warranty terms of up to 30 years. Hansol remains a credible option particularly within the Korean domestic market, but its narrower international presence and less documented product pipeline make it a harder sell for buyers outside Korea who need long-term supply assurance.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hansol/ \| Hansol Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/hansol-technics \| Are Hansol Technics panels the best solar panels to buy - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - EcoWatch \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hansol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [Hansol vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [Hansol vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hansol-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

