---
title: "Hanersun vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hanersun vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-risen"
---

# Hanersun vs Risen

Hanersun has the broader catalog (254 vs 153 models). Hanersun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hanersun | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Ninghai |
| Founded |  | 1986 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hanersun | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 254 | 153 | +101 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 745 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 547 W | +7 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hanersun | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.00% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 21.82% | +0.37 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hanersun | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 136 (54%) | 125 (82%) | +28 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hanersun skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hanersun | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.8%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 32 (12.6%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 70 (27.6%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 94 (37.0%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 56 (22.0%) | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Hanersun | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (3.1%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 108 (42.5%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 48 (18.9%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 76 (29.9%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 14 (5.5%) | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | Hanersun | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 170 (66.9%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| PERC | 57 (22.4%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| Back Contact | 18 (7.1%) | 0 |
| N-type | 9 (3.5%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 48 (31.4%) |


## Top panels, Hanersun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hanersun is a Chinese module manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2015, making it a comparatively young company next to the industry's established players. Despite its short history it has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, a Top Performer ranking in the Kiwa PVEL reliability scorecard, and a place on the Top 100 Global PV Companies list. By the end of 2025 Hanersun had shipped just over 16 GW of modules cumulatively, a scale far below the leading tier of manufacturers. Risen Energy, by contrast, has been in the solar business since 2002, operates six manufacturing bases across China and Malaysia, runs annual production capacity of roughly 48 GW, and has shipped more than 114 GW cumulatively, giving it a considerably stronger institutional and financial footprint.

Hanersun's lineup centers on large-format 600W+ and 700W+ modules, split between TOPCon and PERC cell technology, aimed at both residential and commercial installations. Risen has pivoted heavily toward n-type HJT heterojunction technology, with its flagship Hyper-ion Pro line now averaging 740 W in mass production; these modules serve utility-scale ground-mount plants as well as residential setups, where Risen also bundles microinverters and battery storage into full home energy packages.

For a typical buyer, whether a residential installer or a utility-scale developer, Risen is the safer default choice thanks to its longer track record, larger manufacturing base, and broader global footprint, which tends to simplify warranty support and project financing. Hanersun remains a credible alternative, particularly where very high per-panel wattage is the priority, but its shorter market presence means less long-term field data is available to back its durability claims.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hanersun vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [Hanersun vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [Hanersun vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.