---
title: "Hanersun vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hanersun vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-q-cells"
---

# Hanersun vs Q-Cells

Hanersun has the broader catalog (254 vs 89 models). Hanersun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Hanersun leans bifacial (54% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hanersun | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hanersun | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 254 | 89 | +165 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 675 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 468 W | +72 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hanersun | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 21.21% | +0.98 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hanersun | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.025 |
| Bifacial Share | 136 (54%) | 35 (39%) | +14 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hanersun skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hanersun | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.8%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 32 (12.6%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 70 (27.6%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 94 (37.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 56 (22.0%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Hanersun offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Hanersun | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (3.1%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 108 (42.5%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 48 (18.9%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 76 (29.9%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 14 (5.5%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Hanersun | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 170 (66.9%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 57 (22.4%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| Back Contact | 18 (7.1%) | 0 |
| N-type | 9 (3.5%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Hanersun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hanersun is a Chinese PV module manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2015. Despite its relatively young age, it scaled quickly, having shipped a cumulative 16 GW of modules by the end of 2025 with several GW of annual production capacity, and it holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status along with a Top Performer award from Kiwa PVEL. Q-Cells (Hanwha Q CELLS) has a much longer track record - originally founded in Germany in 1999 as Q.CELLS AG, acquired out of bankruptcy by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012, and now operating as a vertically integrated manufacturer with facilities in South Korea, Malaysia, China and the US (Dalton, Georgia), maintaining Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability. In terms of institutional depth and market longevity, Q-Cells clearly has the stronger footprint, backed by the financial and manufacturing scale of the wider Hanwha group.

Hanersun has focused on high-wattage modules, positioning itself as an early mover in the 600W+ and 700W+ segment using N-type TOPCon and HJT cell technology, targeting residential, commercial and utility-scale projects alike. Q-Cells fields the well-known Q.TRON line built on its Q.ANTUM NEO (TOPCon) technology, including residential-oriented panels such as the Q.TRON AC with an integrated microinverter, plus bifacial XL modules aimed at C&I and utility-scale installations. Both companies effectively cover the same market segments, though Q-Cells benefits from a longer installed base in Europe and the US, which generally translates into easier access to local service networks and certifications.

For a typical buyer - a homeowner or installer prioritizing a bankable, well-documented product - Q-Cells remains the safer default given its longer market presence and the backing of the Hanwha group. Hanersun is nonetheless a credible alternative, particularly where price-to-power ratio on large-format modules matters, and its Tier 1 status and PVEL results help offset its shorter brand history. In practice, the gap between the two is more about brand pedigree than any fundamental difference in underlying technology.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hanersun vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Hanersun vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Hanersun vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.