---
title: "Hanersun vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hanersun vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Hanersun vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 254 models). Hanersun leans bifacial (54% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hanersun | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hanersun | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 254 | 637 | +383 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 735 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 523 W | +17 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hanersun | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 22.18% | +0.02 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hanersun | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 136 (54%) | 231 (36%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hanersun | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.8%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 32 (12.6%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 70 (27.6%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 94 (37.0%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 56 (22.0%) | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Hanersun offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Hanersun | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (3.1%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 108 (42.5%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 48 (18.9%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 76 (29.9%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 14 (5.5%) | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Hanersun | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 170 (66.9%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| PERC | 57 (22.4%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| Back Contact | 18 (7.1%) | 0 |
| N-type | 9 (3.5%) | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Hanersun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, is among the world's largest solar module manufacturers by shipment volume, holding confirmed Tier 1 bankable status and a stated production capacity of 130 GW. The company delivered approximately 41 GW in the first half of 2025 alone, representing cumulative global installations exceeding 300 GW and an estimated 13% share of the global PV module market. Hanersun, by contrast, was established in 2015 in Nanjing, China, and represents a newer wave of Chinese manufacturers emphasizing technological advancement alongside international growth - it does not currently hold Tier 1 bankable status, though cumulative deliveries have surpassed 16 GW across more than 100 countries and the company is actively expanding in Europe through supply agreements in markets such as Spain.

Both manufacturers center their portfolios on TOPCon cell technology, but the breadth and depth of their offerings differ substantially. Jinko Solar's 545-model lineup includes panels reaching a maximum efficiency of 24.8% and an average portfolio efficiency of 22.0%, supported by a world-record n-type TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% verified independently in late 2025. Jinko's slightly superior average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C (versus Hanersun's -0.325%/°C) gives it a measurable performance advantage in warm climates, making it well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bankability, supply continuity, and long-term performance guarantees are paramount. Hanersun's 129-panel portfolio caps at 22.7% efficiency with an average of 21.5%, but it carries a notably higher bifacial share of 40.3% compared to Jinko's 31.9%, and a higher average module power of 522 Wp - attributes that are particularly relevant for residential rooftop installations and small commercial projects where rear-side gain and power density on limited roof areas matter.

For international buyers and project developers who require financeable, bankable products - especially for utility-scale or large C&I projects subject to project finance scrutiny - Jinko Solar presents the lower-risk profile, backed by its Tier 1 classification, massive supply chain, and an 11-year consecutive PVEL Top Performer track record. Hanersun is a technically capable alternative worth consideration for installers and buyers in the residential and small commercial segments who prioritize a strong bifacial portfolio and are not constrained by strict bankability requirements.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hanersun vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Hanersun vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Hanersun vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.