---
title: "Hanersun vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Hanersun vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-akcome"
---

# Hanersun vs AKCOME

Hanersun has the broader catalog (254 vs 3 models). Hanersun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Hanersun | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Suzhou |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Hanersun | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 254 | 3 | +251 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 700 W | +50 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 672 W | +132 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Hanersun | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.54% | +2.26 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 21.63% | +0.57 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Hanersun | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 136 (54%) | 3 (100%) | +46 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hanersun skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Hanersun | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 32 (12.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 70 (27.6%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 94 (37.0%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 56 (22.0%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Hanersun | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (3.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 108 (42.5%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 48 (18.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 76 (29.9%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 14 (5.5%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Hanersun | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 170 (66.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 57 (22.4%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 18 (7.1%) | 0 |
| N-type | 9 (3.5%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Hanersun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hanersun is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in the early 2010s and focused on vertically integrated module production. The company has achieved BNEF Tier 1 status and holds a PV Tech bankability rating of CCC+, signaling a credible but mid-tier institutional standing. Hanersun has been named a Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL's 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard and reportedly reached approximately 5 GW of annual production capacity by 2025, with cumulative shipments exceeding 16 GW. AKCOME is an older Chinese player, founded in 2006 and publicly listed since 2010, which once appeared on the Bloomberg Tier 1 list as recently as 2022. However, AKCOME's financial position has deteriorated sharply - its subsidiary Zhejiang Akcome was forced into court-ordered bankruptcy reorganization in mid-2024, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange delisted the company after shares fell below the minimum threshold, and the firm was removed from the TaiyangNews Top Solar Modules listing due to an inaccessible website. On institutional footprint, Hanersun holds a clear and current advantage.

Hanersun's product range spans residential and utility-scale segments, with TOPCon as its dominant cell technology and a newer ABC (back-contact) series pushing above 23% module efficiency. The lineup covers formats from sub-400 W residential panels to high-density modules above 600 W for ground-mount projects. AKCOME built its technical identity around heterojunction (HJT) technology and achieved notably high mass-production cell efficiencies of around 25.3%-25.6%, positioning it as a premium-cell specialist. However, given the company's financial instability and production suspensions across multiple subsidiaries, whether those technical benchmarks translate into reliable module supply today is uncertain.

For most buyers in 2025, Hanersun is the more defensible choice between these two. Its active BNEF Tier 1 recognition, confirmed third-party reliability test results, and stable operational footing make it a bankable option for both residential and commercial projects. AKCOME's HJT technology is genuinely impressive on paper, but the bankruptcy proceedings and delisting create unacceptable warranty and supply-chain risk for any project requiring long-term manufacturer support. Unless a buyer has verified that AKCOME's restructuring has concluded and production has resumed under sound financial management, the risk profile makes it difficult to recommend as a primary choice.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/11/15/hanersun-launches-abc-solar-module-series-with-up-to-23-2-efficiency/ \| Hanersun launches ABC solar module series with up to 23.2% efficiency \| article

\- https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/hanersun-energy/ \| Hanersun Energy - Kiwa PVEL 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard \| review

\- https://canalsolar.com.br/en/hanersun-is-classified-as-tier-1-by-bnef/ \| Hanersun classified as Tier 1 by BNEF \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/07/30/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process/ \| AKCOME provides update on restructuring process - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technologies on HJT cell production and copper plating processes \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Hanersun vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Hanersun vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Hanersun vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/hanersun-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.