---
title: "Growatt vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Growatt vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Growatt vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 1 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Growatt | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2010 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.growatt.com](https://www.growatt.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Growatt | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 340 | +339 |
| Max Power | 150 W | 760 W | +610 W |
| Avg Power | 150 W | 520 W | +370 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Growatt | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 18.60% | 24.80% | +6.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.60% | 21.71% | +3.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Growatt | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.420%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.118 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Growatt | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Growatt | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Growatt | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 1 (100.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Growatt


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-EFS150M](https://comparepv.com/panel/growatt-ts-efs150m) | 150 | 18.6 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Growatt is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2010 and headquartered in Shenzhen, best known as one of the world's leading residential inverter suppliers, ranking number one globally by shipment volume in that segment and serving more than 3.3 million end users through its cloud platform. The company also produces solar modules, but this business is secondary to its core inverter portfolio, and its module bankability has not been independently confirmed at the Tier 1 BloombergNEF level in the way that dedicated panel makers are rated. Trina Solar presents a very different profile: founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, it is one of the world's largest dedicated module manufacturers, with annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 292 GW as of mid-2025. Trina holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has achieved a 100% bankability rating in BloombergNEF's PV Module Bankability survey eight consecutive times, and has been a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years - giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint with project developers and lenders.

Growatt's module lineup is built around PERC cell technology, targeting residential and commercial rooftop applications in the 380-460 W power class. For installers already committed to the Growatt inverter ecosystem, the panels can offer a convenient single-brand solution and confirmed compatibility. However, PERC technology is now trailing the broader market shift toward N-type cells. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex S+ series uses N-type i-TOPCon cell technology, delivering efficiencies around 22.3%, annual degradation as low as 0.4%, and a 30-year power output warranty that exceeds the standard industry commitment. Trina serves residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and large utility-scale ground-mount segments, making it a versatile specification across all project types.

For a typical international buyer - residential or commercial - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice, combining proven bankability, more advanced cell technology, and a deeper warranty commitment. Growatt panels are a reasonable option mainly when building a fully integrated Growatt ecosystem where inverter compatibility and single-vendor support outweigh module-level bankability. The two brands are not truly interchangeable: Trina Solar occupies a dedicated Tier 1 module manufacturer position, while Growatt's panel offering remains ancillary to its primary inverter business.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Growatt vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Growatt vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Growatt vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.