---
title: "Growatt vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Growatt vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Growatt vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 1 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Growatt | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2010 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.growatt.com](https://www.growatt.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Growatt | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 637 | +636 |
| Max Power | 150 W | 735 W | +585 W |
| Avg Power | 150 W | 523 W | +373 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Growatt | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 18.60% | 24.80% | +6.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.60% | 22.18% | +3.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Growatt | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.420%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.116 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Growatt | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Growatt | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Growatt | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 1 (100.0%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Growatt


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-EFS150M](https://comparepv.com/panel/growatt-ts-efs150m) | 150 | 18.6 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Growatt, founded in 2010 in China, is primarily recognized in the industry as a leading inverter and battery storage manufacturer rather than a solar panel producer. Its panel catalog contains a single module rated at 150 Wp using PERC cell technology, with an efficiency of 18.6% and a temperature coefficient of -0.42%/°C; the company does not hold Tier 1 bankable status. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, occupies a fundamentally different position - it is currently the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipment volume, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. Tier 1 bankable and publicly traded, Jinko holds approximately 13% global market share as of 2025 and has surpassed 300 GW in cumulative shipments, cementing its standing as a benchmark supplier for project finance and large-scale procurement.

Jinko Solar's panel portfolio spans 545 modules, with an average power output of 511 Wp and a maximum of 735 Wp. The dominant cell technology is TOPCon (N-type), which accounts for roughly 39% of the portfolio and delivers a superior temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C - a meaningful advantage over Growatt's -0.42%/°C in warm or high-irradiation environments. Maximum module efficiency reaches 24.8% against a portfolio average of 22.0%. Approximately 32% of Jinko's lineup consists of bifacial modules, and the average product warranty extends to roughly 28.5 years. These attributes make Jinko panels well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial rooftop installations, and residential rooftop systems where energy yield per square meter is a priority. Growatt's single 150 Wp PERC module is better aligned with off-grid, portable, or small standalone applications and does not compete meaningfully in the mainstream grid-tied segment.

For international buyers evaluating the two as module suppliers, Jinko Solar is the clear choice across virtually all project types. Its Tier 1 status, NYSE listing, proven manufacturing scale, advanced TOPCon technology, and comprehensive product range provide the performance benchmarks and financial assurances required by lenders, EPCs, and independent power producers. Growatt remains a credible and cost-competitive brand in the inverter and BESS space, but its current panel offering is too limited in scope and technology generation to serve as a viable alternative to Jinko Solar for any significant grid-connected installation.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Growatt vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Growatt vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Growatt vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/growatt-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.