---
title: "Green Energy Supplier vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Green Energy Supplier vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/green-energy-supplier-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Green Energy Supplier vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Bulgaria | China |
| Headquarters | Sofia | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://green-energy.bg](https://green-energy.bg) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Green Energy Supplier is a Bulgarian distributor of photovoltaic equipment, offering solar panels, inverters, and energy storage systems from leading manufacturers such as LONGi, Risen Energy, JA Solar, Huawei, and Deye. The company provides consultations, system design, and supply of solar equipment for residential...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Green Energy Supplier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Green Energy Supplier is a brand for which no verifiable data could be confirmed through independent industry sources - no BNEF Tier 1 designation, no documented annual production volume, and no traceable corporate history appeared in searches across pv-magazine.com, pvtech.org, energytrend.com, or official Bloomberg NEF tier lists. The name may belong to a regional distributor selling rebranded modules, a small domestic manufacturer, or a trading intermediary - but without third-party confirmation, its market standing and long-term warranty bankability cannot be responsibly assessed. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a well-established Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou and founded in 1997 by Gao Jifan. It holds a continuous BNEF Tier 1 rating, shipped over 70 GW of modules in 2024 to rank fourth globally, and surpassed 225 GW in cumulative shipments by early 2025. On every institutional metric - bankability, scale, and geographic reach across more than 170 countries - Trina Solar is the demonstrably stronger entity.

Trina Solar's product lineup is organized around n-type TOPCon technology across three segments. The Vertex N series, including a 760 W module rated at 24.5% efficiency confirmed by pv-magazine in late 2024, targets utility-scale ground-mount projects where power density and low balance-of-system cost are paramount. The third-generation Vertex S+ G3 dual-glass modules serve residential rooftop and commercial C&I installations, featuring a temperature coefficient of -0.26% per degree Celsius and enhanced durability for mixed-climate environments. A 670 W mid-format module released in mid-2026 bridges the gap for agrivoltaic and smaller ground-mount applications. The company is also actively diversifying manufacturing outside China, reducing exposure to tariff and supply-chain disruption risks that matter increasingly to project developers in Europe and North America.

For a typical international buyer - whether financing a utility-scale project that requires bankable equipment or selecting a tier-1 brand for a commercial rooftop installation - Trina Solar is a straightforward, low-risk default supported by decades of independent field data. Green Energy Supplier cannot be meaningfully compared at this time because the absence of verifiable public information makes any long-term risk assessment unreliable. Any buyer considering that brand should first independently verify IEC certifications, financial standing, and a documented project reference list before committing.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Green Energy Supplier vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/green-energy-supplier-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Green Energy Supplier vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/green-energy-supplier-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Green Energy Supplier vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/green-energy-supplier-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/green-energy-supplier-vs-trina-solar