---
title: "GoodWe vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GoodWe vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-trina-solar"
---

# GoodWe vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GoodWe | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2010 | 1997 |
| Employees | 5000+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SSE: 688390 |  |
| Website | [https://en.goodwe.com](https://en.goodwe.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GoodWe | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GoodWe | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GoodWe | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GoodWe | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | GoodWe | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | GoodWe | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GoodWe is a Chinese power technology company founded in 2010 and headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu province. Although sometimes categorized alongside solar-panel brands, GoodWe is primarily an inverter specialist: it holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as an inverter manufacturer and was recognized by S&P Global Commodity Insights as a Tier 1 inverter supplier in 2025. The company has reached 100 GW of cumulative inverter installations worldwide, operates at roughly 35 GW of annual inverter production capacity, and is ranked by Wood Mackenzie as the world's number one residential hybrid inverter supplier. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a dedicated module manufacturer founded in December 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, with annual panel production capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative module shipments surpassing 292 GW as of mid-2025. Trina earned a 100% bankability rating in BloombergNEF's PV Module Bankability 2025 assessment - the eighth time it has achieved unanimous recognition - and has been a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. As a solar panel manufacturer, Trina Solar carries significantly greater scale and institutional standing.

Trina Solar's flagship product lines fall under the Vertex family, which includes the Vertex S and Vertex S+ formats suited to residential rooftops and light commercial applications, as well as larger Vertex configurations targeting utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects. These modules are built on N-type TOPCon cell technology with multi-busbar architecture, reaching efficiencies of up to 22.5% at pricing that sits modestly below the market average. GoodWe does produce building-integrated photovoltaic products under its PVBM sub-brand, but it is not a meaningful presence in the commodity solar panel segment. For buyers sourcing modules, these two brands occupy different layers of the solar value chain rather than competing head to head.

For any buyer whose primary goal is procuring solar panels, Trina Solar is the clear default: it offers decades of module manufacturing experience, independently verified top-tier bankability, and a product range spanning every segment from residential rooftop to large-scale utility. GoodWe is best evaluated on its own terms as an inverter and energy storage provider - and it is in fact a well-regarded pairing with Trina modules. Buyers building a complete system shortlist should benchmark GoodWe against other inverter brands rather than against Trina Solar directly.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GoodWe vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [GoodWe vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [GoodWe vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-trina-solar