---
title: "GoodWe vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GoodWe vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# GoodWe vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GoodWe | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2010 | 2006 |
| Employees | 5000+ | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SSE: 688390 | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://en.goodwe.com](https://en.goodwe.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GoodWe | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GoodWe | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GoodWe | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GoodWe | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | GoodWe | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | GoodWe | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GoodWe and Jinko Solar are two well-established Chinese manufacturers in the photovoltaic industry, but they occupy fundamentally different product segments, which is the key context for any comparison. GoodWe, founded in 2010 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, is exclusively an inverter and energy storage system manufacturer - it produces no solar panels. With over 5,000 employees, a manufacturing capacity of 35 GW for inverters, and more than 100 GW of cumulative installed capacity worldwide, GoodWe ranks among the top 5 global PV inverter vendors and holds the position of the world's leading residential hybrid inverter supplier according to Wood Mackenzie. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of 33,830 employees. Both companies carry Tier 1 bankable status, confirming their financial and operational credibility with project lenders.

GoodWe's product strength lies in its broad range of string inverters, hybrid inverters, and battery storage solutions suited to residential rooftop installs and commercial C&I projects alike. Its competitive price-to-performance ratio and wide service network make it a frequent choice for installers across Europe. Jinko Solar, by contrast, competes on module technology and scale - its catalog of 545 panels reaches a maximum output of 735 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%, with an average panel efficiency of approximately 22.0%. TOPCon is the leading cell technology in its portfolio, accounting for around 39.4% of offerings, while bifacial modules represent roughly 31.9% of the range. The average product warranty across its lineup stands at nearly 28.5 years, underpinning suitability for utility-scale ground-mount and long-term commercial C&I projects where bankability and degradation rates matter most.

For international buyers, GoodWe and Jinko Solar are in practice complementary rather than competing choices - GoodWe for the inverter and storage layer, Jinko for the module layer. Buyers selecting a module supplier will find Jinko's deep TOPCon portfolio, strong bifacial offering, and NYSE-listed transparency compelling for both residential and large-scale procurement. Those selecting inverter and storage solutions will find GoodWe's hybrid ecosystem, competitive pricing, and Tier 1 bankability well-suited to markets where residential storage adoption is growing rapidly.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GoodWe vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [GoodWe vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [GoodWe vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-jinko-solar