---
title: "GoodWe vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GoodWe vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-aiko"
---

# GoodWe vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GoodWe | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
| Employees | 5000+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SSE: 688390 | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://en.goodwe.com](https://en.goodwe.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GoodWe | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 144 | +144 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 805 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 581 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GoodWe | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 25.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 23.65% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GoodWe | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.271%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.5 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GoodWe | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | GoodWe | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | GoodWe | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar module manufacturer focused exclusively on panel production, having secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status as of Q3 2024. By Q1 2025, the company reported a manufacturing capacity of approximately 20 GW per year and has drawn attention from installers and project financiers by consistently pushing cell-level efficiency records. GoodWe, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Suzhou, China, occupies a fundamentally different position in the supply chain: it is primarily a solar inverter and energy storage manufacturer, recognized by BloombergNEF as a Tier 1 inverter supplier, with an inverter production capacity reported at 35 GW annually. GoodWe does produce some photovoltaic building material (PVBM) modules, but it is not a conventional panel manufacturer in the way AIKO is. As a result, AIKO carries the stronger institutional footprint specifically in the solar module segment.

AIKO's panel lineup is built entirely around proprietary N-type All Back Contact (ABC) cells, which relocate both electrode contacts to the rear surface, eliminating front-side shading losses. Its Neostar series targets residential rooftops, the Comet series is sized for commercial and industrial applications, and the Stellar series addresses utility-scale ground mounts. Third-generation residential modules announced for 2025-2026 reach efficiencies up to 25%, with a notably low temperature coefficient. GoodWe's PVBM line is oriented toward building-integrated photovoltaics rather than conventional rack-mounted installations and is far narrower in scope.

For a buyer selecting solar panels in 2025, AIKO and GoodWe are not interchangeable - they serve different parts of the system. AIKO is the relevant choice when specifying high-efficiency modules; GoodWe is the relevant choice when specifying inverters or battery storage. A project deploying both products together, AIKO panels paired with a GoodWe inverter, is a common and sensible configuration rather than a competitive one.

\---LINKS---

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - official announcement \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/ \| AIKO ABC panels real-world performance test - MC Electrical \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/goodwe-solar-panel-review/ \| GoodWe solar panel independent review - Solar Choice \| review

\- https://strategicenergy.eu/bloombergnef-names-goodwe-a-tier-1-inverter-manufacturer/ \| BloombergNEF names GoodWe a Tier 1 inverter manufacturer \| article

Sources:

\- \[AIKO Achieves Prestigious Tier 1 Status by BloombergNEF\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

\- \[Aiko Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[Debunking the AIKO Solar Panel Hype: A Real-World Performance Test\](https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/)

\- \[GoodWe Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/goodwe-solar-panel-review/)

\- \[BloombergNEF names GoodWe a Tier 1 inverter manufacturer\](https://strategicenergy.eu/bloombergnef-names-goodwe-a-tier-1-inverter-manufacturer/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GoodWe vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [GoodWe vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [GoodWe vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/goodwe-vs-aiko