--- title: "Gokin vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Gokin vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-recom" --- # Gokin vs Recom Recom has the broader catalog (61 vs 44 models). Gokin leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%. Recom leans bifacial (38% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Gokin | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | Italy | | Headquarters | | Bolzano | | Founded | | 2007 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Gokin | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 44 | 61 | +17 | | Max Power | 780 W | 730 W | +50 W | | Avg Power | 517 W | 548 W | +31 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Gokin | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.50% | 24.30% | +0.20 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 23.58% | 22.68% | +0.90 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Gokin | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.260%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.024 | | Bifacial Share | 5 (11%) | 23 (38%) | +26 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Gokin skews to higher efficiency: 82% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Gokin | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | 22-23% | 8 (18.2%) | 36 (59.0%) | | 23%+ | 36 (81.8%) | 20 (32.8%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | ## Power distribution Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup) | Power band | Gokin | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 28 (63.6%) | 34 (55.7%) | | 500-599W | 11 (25.0%) | 5 (8.2%) | | 700W+ | 5 (11.4%) | 10 (16.4%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 12 (19.7%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%) | Technology | Gokin | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 44 (100.0%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 51 (83.6%) | | HJT | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | ## Top panels, Gokin | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [GK-4-78HGBD-780M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-780m) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [GK-4-78HGBD-775M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-775m) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [GK-4-78HGBD-770M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-770m) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [GK-4-78HGBD-765M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-765m) | 765 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [GK-4-78HGBD-760M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-760m) | 760 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [GK-5-60HG-540M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-540m) | 540 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [GK-5-60HG-535M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-535m) | 535 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [GK-5-60HG-530M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-530m) | 530 | 23.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [GK-5-60HG-525M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-525m) | 525 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [GK-5-60HG-520M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-520m) | 520 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Recom | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Gokin is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2019 and headquartered in the Hengqin Guangdong-Macao Deep Cooperation Zone in Zhuhai, Guangdong Province. It has grown rapidly on the strength of vertically integrated ingot, wafer and module production, reporting a very large combined annual capacity across its Guangdong, Qinghai and Sichuan facilities, and it recently entered the PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings while promoting its "Global BC Eco" back-contact module line. Recom Technologies traces its roots to the early 2000s in Greece, was formally founded around 2007, and now operates out of Milan, Italy, with manufacturing that shifted from Taiwan to Italy and France before consolidating in Italy; it has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status since at least 2019 but reports a comparatively modest annual capacity in the low single-digit gigawatt range. In terms of institutional footprint, Gokin has the larger and faster-growing manufacturing base typical of a top-tier Chinese integrated producer, while Recom has the longer, more established Tier 1 track record as a Western-headquartered brand with a smaller but more geographically diversified operation. The two companies also target different segments. Gokin's product strategy centers on back-contact (BC) cell technology aimed at high-efficiency residential and commercial rooftops, positioning itself as a next-generation alternative to mainstream TOPCon and PERC modules from other large Chinese suppliers. Recom's portfolio, marketed under names such as Puma, Lion, Panther and Jaguar, spans monocrystalline PERC and heterojunction (HJT) modules and serves a broad mix of residential, commercial and utility-scale projects across more than 110 countries; the company has also diversified into inverters, storage and EV chargers, giving it a more systems-oriented offering than a pure module maker. For a typical buyer in 2025, Recom's longer-standing Tier 1 bankability record and European manufacturing base may appeal to buyers prioritizing an established, lender-recognized track record, while Gokin's larger production scale and newer BC technology could suit buyers seeking cutting-edge efficiency from a rapidly expanding Chinese Tier 1 entrant. Given that Gokin's bankability status is very recent, some due diligence on project financing acceptance is still warranted before treating the two brands as fully interchangeable. \---LINKS--- \- https://solarquarter.com/2026/04/29/gokin-solar-enters-pv-tech-bankability-ratings-amid-global-expansion/ \| Gokin Solar Enters PV Tech Bankability Ratings Amid Global Expansion \| article \- https://solarquarter.com/2026/05/11/gokin-solar-hits-3-million-bc-module-milestone-reinforcing-global-pv-supply-capacity/ \| Gokin Solar Hits 3 Million BC Module Milestone \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/gokin-solar \| Gokin Solar Co., Ltd. company profile \| article \- https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/ \| RECOM makes Bloomberg NEF 4Q 2019 Tier 1 Module Maker List \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/recom-review.html \| Recom Solar Panels Review \| review Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Gokin vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom) - [Gokin vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-recom) - [Gokin vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-recom Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.