---
title: "Gokin vs Luxor Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gokin vs Luxor Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-luxor-solar"
---

# Gokin vs Luxor Solar

Luxor Solar has the broader catalog (121 vs 44 models). Gokin leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%. Luxor Solar leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gokin | Luxor Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Germany |
| Headquarters |  | Stuttgart |
| Founded |  | 2007 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.luxor-solar.com](https://www.luxor-solar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gokin | Luxor Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 44 | 121 | +77 |
| Max Power | 780 W | 720 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 517 W | 509 W | +8 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gokin | Luxor Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.50% | 24.12% | +0.38 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.58% | 22.19% | +1.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gokin | Luxor Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.260%/°C | -0.301%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 5 (11%) | 83 (69%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.0 yrs | +2.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gokin skews to higher efficiency: 82% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gokin | Luxor Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 8 (18.2%) | 49 (40.5%) |
| 23%+ | 36 (81.8%) | 21 (17.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 8 (6.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 38 (31.4%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 5 (4.1%) |


## Power distribution

Luxor Solar offers more 600W+ panels (29% of lineup)


| Power band | Gokin | Luxor Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 28 (63.6%) | 57 (47.1%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (25.0%) | 21 (17.4%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (11.4%) | 12 (9.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 8 (6.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 23 (19.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Gokin | Luxor Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 44 (100.0%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 46 (38.0%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 27 (22.3%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 26 (21.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 22 (18.2%) |


## Top panels, Gokin


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GK-4-78HGBD-780M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-780m) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GK-4-78HGBD-775M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-775m) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GK-4-78HGBD-770M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-770m) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GK-4-78HGBD-765M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-765m) | 765 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GK-4-78HGBD-760M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-4-78hgbd-760m) | 760 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GK-5-60HG-540M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-540m) | 540 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GK-5-60HG-535M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-535m) | 535 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GK-5-60HG-530M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-530m) | 530 | 23.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GK-5-60HG-525M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-525m) | 525 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GK-5-60HG-520M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-520m) | 520 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Luxor Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LX-720M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LX-715M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LX-715M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LX-710M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LX-710M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg-1) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LX-705M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LX-705M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg-1) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LX-700M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LX-700M/210-132+ GG BiF](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg-bif) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Gokin vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Luxor Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-luxor-solar)
- [Gokin vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Luxor Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-luxor-solar)
- [Gokin vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Luxor Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-luxor-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gokin-vs-luxor-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.