---
title: "GL Solar vs TCL - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GL Solar vs TCL solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-tcl"
---

# GL Solar vs TCL

GL Solar has the broader catalog (13 vs 0 models). GL Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GL Solar | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Italy | China |
| Headquarters | Marcianise | Huizhou |
| Founded | 2000 | 1981 |
| Employees | 1-10 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.glsolarenergy.it](https://www.glsolarenergy.it) | [https://www.tcl.com](https://www.tcl.com) |

GL Solar Energy s.r.l. is a small Italian company based in Marcianise (Caserta) specializing in the design, production, and installation of photovoltaic systems for residential and industrial applications. The company also distributes solar panels and related equipment, working with major international brands such as...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GL Solar | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 13 | 0 | +13 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 0 W | +640 W |
| Avg Power | 603 W | 0 W | +603 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GL Solar | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.61% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GL Solar | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.274%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 13 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

GL Solar skews to higher efficiency: 38% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GL Solar | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 3 (23.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 5 (38.5%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 5 (38.5%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

GL Solar offers more 600W+ panels (77% of lineup)


| Power band | GL Solar | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 1 (7.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 2 (15.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 10 (76.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (54%)


| Technology | GL Solar | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 7 (53.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (46.2%) | 0 |


## Top panels, GL Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [3SHBGH-C#-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-640) | 640 | 22.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [3SHBGH-C#-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-635) | 635 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [3SHBGH-C#-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-630) | 630 | 22.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [3SHBGH-C#-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625) | 625 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [3SHBGH-C#-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-620) | 620 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [3SHBGH-C#-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615) | 615 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [3SHBGH-C#-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610) | 610 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-605W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-605w) | 605 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [GL Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tcl)
- [GL Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tcl)
- [GL Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tcl)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-tcl

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.