---
title: "GL Solar vs AE Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GL Solar vs AE Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-ae-solar"
---

# GL Solar vs AE Solar

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 13 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. GL Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GL Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Italy | Germany |
| Headquarters | Marcianise | Gersthofen |
| Founded | 2000 | 2003 |
| Employees | 1-10 | 501-1000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 2+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.glsolarenergy.it](https://www.glsolarenergy.it) | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) |

GL Solar Energy s.r.l. is a small Italian company based in Marcianise (Caserta) specializing in the design, production, and installation of photovoltaic systems for residential and industrial applications. The company also distributes solar panels and related equipment, working with major international brands such as...

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GL Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 13 | 646 | +633 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 730 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 603 W | 489 W | +114 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GL Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 24.43% | +0.83 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.61% | 21.11% | +1.50 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GL Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.274%/°C | -0.312%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 13 (100%) | 405 (63%) | +37 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.7 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

GL Solar skews to higher efficiency: 38% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GL Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 3 (23.1%) | 142 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 5 (38.5%) | 199 (30.8%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (38.5%) | 60 (9.3%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 74 (11.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 171 (26.5%) |


## Power distribution

GL Solar offers more 600W+ panels (77% of lineup)


| Power band | GL Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 1 (7.7%) | 329 (50.9%) |
| 500-599W | 2 (15.4%) | 154 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 10 (76.9%) | 55 (8.5%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 78 (12.1%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 30 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)


| Technology | GL Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 7 (53.8%) | 5 (0.8%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (46.2%) | 349 (54.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 245 (37.9%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (2.6%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 9 (1.4%) |


## Top panels, GL Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [3SHBGH-C#-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-640) | 640 | 22.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [3SHBGH-C#-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-635) | 635 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [3SHBGH-C#-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-630) | 630 | 22.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [3SHBGH-C#-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625) | 625 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [3SHBGH-C#-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-620) | 620 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [3SHBGH-C#-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615) | 615 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [3SHBGH-C#-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610) | 610 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-605W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-605w) | 605 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar is a German-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2003 in Gersthofen, Bavaria, with production facilities operating across China, Georgia, and Turkey. The company reports an annual module production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW and held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for fifteen consecutive quarters between 2021 and 2024; a 2024 BNEF survey identified it as the sole European PV module manufacturer with high bankability - a distinction that sets it apart from virtually every other European-origin brand in the industry. GL Solar (GL Solar Energy S.r.l.), by contrast, is a small Italian firm established in 2000 and based in Marcianise, Campania, whose operations are focused on the design, engineering, and local installation of photovoltaic systems rather than large-scale module manufacturing. It holds ISO 9001 quality certification and a SOA credential for public-works contracts but does not appear on any international bankability ranking or production-volume index. In terms of institutional footprint, AE Solar is the substantially larger and more widely recognized entity.

AE Solar's product range centers on two technology families. The Aurora Series uses P-type PERC cells and targets cost-sensitive residential and commercial rooftop applications, with module outputs reaching around 415 W. The flagship Meteor Series, built on N-type TOPCon cells and available in bifacial configurations up to 725 W, is suited to utility-scale ground-mount farms and demanding commercial-and-industrial projects where module efficiency and long-term degradation rates carry significant weight; PV Magazine awarded the Meteor line a five-star rating in independent performance testing. GL Solar Energy does not publish an internationally reviewed module catalog of comparable scope - its offer appears oriented toward smaller stand-alone and off-grid systems within the Italian domestic market.

For most international buyers, AE Solar is the clear default. Its verified Tier 1 bankability, multi-gigawatt production scale, and independently tested N-type TOPCon technology make it a credible choice for projects ranging from residential rooftops to large ground-mount installations. GL Solar Energy, while presumably competent within its local niche, lacks the production capacity, international certifications, and global market presence required to serve as a like-for-like alternative. These two brands are not interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GL Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ae-solar)
- [GL Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ae-solar)
- [GL Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ae-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gl-solar-vs-ae-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.