---
title: "Gintech vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gintech vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Gintech vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 7 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gintech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Headquarters | Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park) | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 1997 |
| Employees | 1000-2000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | TWSE: 3514 |  |
| Website | [https://www.ureusa.com](https://www.ureusa.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gintech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 7 | 340 | +333 |
| Max Power | 365 W | 760 W | +395 W |
| Avg Power | 281 W | 520 W | +239 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gintech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 18.80% | 24.80% | +6.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.61% | 21.71% | +5.10 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gintech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.416%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.114 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gintech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (100.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Gintech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (100.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (29%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Gintech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 5 (71.4%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| PERC | 2 (28.6%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Gintech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GIN M6F-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-m6f-72) | 365 | 18.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GIN P6F-60-280W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-280w) | 280 | 17.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 3 | [GIN P6F-60-275W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-275w) | 275 | 16.7 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 4 | [GIN P6F-60-270W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-270w) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [GIN P6F-60-265W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-265w) | 265 | 16.1 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 6 | [GIN P6F-60-260W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-260w) | 260 | 15.8 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 7 | [GIN P6F-60-255W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-255w) | 255 | 15.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese solar cell manufacturer founded in August 2005 and headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan. From the outset the company operated as a B2B cell supplier, delivering crystalline silicon cells to module manufacturers rather than selling finished panels to installers or end-users. In October 2018, Gintech merged with Neo Solar Power and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. (URECO), ending Gintech's independent existence as a brand. The combined entity carried a total cell production capacity of approximately 4.5 GW. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. It has maintained continuous Tier 1 status from BloombergNEF for many years and is the only PV manufacturer to have achieved 100% bankability on the BNEF survey eight times. Module production capacity is forecast to approach 95 GW by end of 2025. In terms of institutional footprint, global distribution, and ongoing market presence, Trina Solar is substantially the stronger of the two.

During its independent years, Gintech's product lines - Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix - were crystalline silicon cells sold upstream in the supply chain, meaning the brand had limited direct visibility at the project or installer level. Trina Solar's current Vertex family covers every major market segment: the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra lineup includes a 760 W module for utility-scale ground-mount projects, a 670 W format for commercial and industrial rooftops, and a 495 W panel for residential installations. TOPCon is confirmed as the dominant cell technology across Trina's current portfolio, with mass-production efficiency reaching 24.5% on flagship utility modules. Trina has also earned eleven consecutive years of recognition as a PVEL Top Performer, providing meaningful comfort for project lenders and long-term asset owners.

For buyers evaluating these two brand names today, the comparison is effectively asymmetric. Gintech no longer exists as an independent manufacturer, its assets and intellectual property having been absorbed into URECO in 2018. Trina Solar remains one of the most bankable and widely specified solar brands in the world, backed by a 30-year linear performance warranty on flagship models. Unless a procurement process specifically calls for URECO-branded products (the direct corporate successor to Gintech), Trina Solar is the clear default choice for new installations across residential, commercial, and utility segments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Gintech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Gintech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Gintech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.