--- title: "Gintech vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Gintech vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-hyundai" --- # Gintech vs Hyundai Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 7 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Gintech | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Taiwan | South Korea | | Headquarters | Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park) | Seongnam-si | | Founded | 2005 | 2004 | | Employees | 1000-2000 | 206 | | Annual capacity | | 1.35 GW/year | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | TWSE: 3514 | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | | Website | [https://www.ureusa.com](https://www.ureusa.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged... HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Gintech | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 7 | 65 | +58 | | Max Power | 365 W | 640 W | +275 W | | Avg Power | 281 W | 442 W | +161 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Gintech | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 18.80% | 23.40% | +4.60 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.61% | 21.49% | +4.88 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Gintech | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.416%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.115 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Gintech | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (100.0%) | 7 (10.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | Gintech | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 7 (100.0%) | 8 (12.3%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (29%) Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) | Technology | Gintech | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 5 (71.4%) | 9 (13.8%) | | PERC | 2 (28.6%) | 25 (38.5%) | | HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) | ## Top panels, Gintech | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [GIN M6F-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-m6f-72) | 365 | 18.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [GIN P6F-60-280W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-280w) | 280 | 17.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | | 3 | [GIN P6F-60-275W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-275w) | 275 | 16.7 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | | 4 | [GIN P6F-60-270W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-270w) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [GIN P6F-60-265W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-265w) | 265 | 16.1 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | | 6 | [GIN P6F-60-260W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-260w) | 260 | 15.8 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | | 7 | [GIN P6F-60-255W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gintech-gin-p6f-60-255w) | 255 | 15.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese solar cell manufacturer founded in 2006 and listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2007. The company scaled aggressively through the late 2000s and early 2010s, at one point operating one of the largest single-building solar cell plants in the world. In 2018, Gintech merged with fellow Taiwanese firms Neo Solar Power and Solartech to form United Renewable Energy Co. (URE), and the Gintech brand effectively ceased to exist as an independent entity. URE carries forward Gintech's manufacturing heritage with combined cell capacity of approximately 2.5 GW spread across Taiwan, Vietnam, and Thailand. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, by contrast, is a South Korean manufacturer founded in 2004 and operating as a subsidiary of the broader HD Hyundai industrial group. It holds confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and runs production facilities with roughly 1.35-1.4 GW of annual capacity located in South Korea. On institutional footprint and current market visibility, Hyundai has the clearer and more active presence. Because Gintech no longer markets panels under its own name - its assets and lines having been absorbed into URE - a direct product comparison is difficult. URE's current lineup has been built around PERC technology, with a stated transition toward TOPCon underway in 2025 as it consolidates those production lines at its Tainan factory. Hyundai, by contrast, actively markets a defined product family: the XG and YH series for residential use, and the HiN-T range for commercial and utility-scale applications, all built around N-type TOPCon cell technology produced under license in-house. The HiN-T 640W module received PVEL PQP Top Performer recognition in 2025, providing independent third-party validation of module reliability. For a buyer searching for panels today, Hyundai is the practical choice between these two names. Gintech as a standalone brand is no longer actively sold through normal channels, meaning any panels carrying that label would represent legacy or old-stock inventory. Hyundai offers a current catalog, confirmed bankability, a maturing TOPCon portfolio, and independent test-performance recognition, making it the default recommendation by a significant margin. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/12/taiwans-united-renewable-energy-to-lay-off-more-than-100-employees/ \| Taiwan's URE to lay off staff and consolidate TOPCon production in 2025 \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/02/22/taiwans-ure-increases-module-capacity-by-500-mw/ \| Taiwan's URE increases module capacity by 500 MW - pv magazine \| article \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article \- https://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/13/taiwans-gintech-energy-announces-350-mw-solar-cell-production-unit-thailand/ \| Taiwan's Gintech Energy announces 350 MW solar cell plant in Thailand - CleanTechnica \| article Sources: \- \[Taiwan's United Renewable Energy to lay off employees (pv-magazine)\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/12/taiwans-united-renewable-energy-to-lay-off-more-than-100-employees/) \- \[Taiwan's URE increases module capacity by 500 MW (pv-magazine)\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/02/22/taiwans-ure-increases-module-capacity-by-500-mw/) \- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 (SolarReviews)\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels) \- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells (pv-magazine USA)\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/) \- \[Taiwan's Gintech Energy Announces 350 MW Solar Cell Unit in Thailand (CleanTechnica)\](https://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/13/taiwans-gintech-energy-announces-350-mw-solar-cell-production-unit-thailand/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Gintech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai) - [Gintech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai) - [Gintech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/gintech-vs-hyundai Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.