---
title: "GCL vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GCL vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-seraphim"
---

# GCL vs Seraphim

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 160 models). GCL leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | GCL | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou/Hong Kong | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1990 | 2011 |
| Employees | 6000+ | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 30+ GW/year | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Hong Kong Stock Exchange/Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 03800.HK/002506.SZ |  |
| Website | [http://www.gcltech.com/](http://www.gcltech.com/) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GCL | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 232 | 160 | +72 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 730 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 558 W | 549 W | +9 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GCL | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.50% | 23.50% | +1.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 21.82% | +0.20 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GCL | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.320%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 151 (65%) | 111 (69%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GCL | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 43 (18.5%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 73 (31.5%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (20.7%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 66 (28.4%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | GCL | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (2.6%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 60 (25.9%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 63 (27.2%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 81 (34.9%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 22 (9.5%) | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)


| Technology | GCL | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 108 (46.6%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| PERC | 102 (44.0%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| N-type | 10 (4.3%) | 4 (2.5%) |
| HJT | 7 (3.0%) | 6 (3.8%) |
| BIPV | 5 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Top panels, GCL


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF 725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725-1) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GCL-NH12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nh12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GCL, formally GCL System Integration Technology Co., Ltd. (GCL-SI), is part of the GCL Group conglomerate headquartered in Jiangsu, China. The group traces its origins to 1990, with the solar module division developing into one of the most vertically integrated solar enterprises in the world, producing polysilicon, wafers, cells, and modules internally. GCL-SI has declared an annual module capacity of approximately 30 GW and is planning a 60 GW facility in Hefei, placing it among the largest manufacturers globally by sheer volume. Seraphim - formally Jiangsu Seraphim Solar Systems Co., Ltd. - was founded in 2011 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, and has grown to an estimated production capacity of around 13 GW. Seraphim has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for eleven consecutive years since 2015 and has earned six PVEL Top Performer recognitions, giving it a well-documented institutional track record. On the measure of confirmed bankability credentials, Seraphim carries the stronger footprint, as GCL's Tier 1 status is less consistently verified across independent industry sources.

GCL's current lineup centers on its LOTUS TOPCon series, with modules reaching around 575 W and efficiencies near 22.3%. The company is also advancing perovskite and tandem cell technology, having commissioned the world's first GW-scale tandem module manufacturing base in 2025. GCL products are primarily targeted at utility-scale and large commercial projects, where vertical supply chain integration enables competitive pricing on high-volume procurement. Seraphim covers a broader application range, offering TOPCon bifacial modules for commercial rooftop and ground-mount installations alongside HJT modules reaching 720 W for premium segments. Confirmed efficiencies across Seraphim's portfolio reach up to 22.5%, and manufacturing presence in China, Vietnam, and South Africa allows the brand to serve markets with local-content requirements.

For buyers financing large projects through international banks, Seraphim's consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 record and PVEL quality awards make lender due diligence more straightforward, giving it a practical edge over GCL in project-finance contexts. GCL is a compelling option for cost-sensitive, high-volume utility procurement, where its production scale and integrated supply chain translate into price leverage. In terms of core cell technology, both brands now offer competitive TOPCon products and are broadly interchangeable for buyers whose primary driver is module performance rather than bankability documentation.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GCL vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [GCL vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [GCL vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.