---
title: "GCL vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GCL vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-risen"
---

# GCL vs Risen

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 153 models). GCL leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GCL | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou/Hong Kong | Ninghai |
| Founded | 1990 | 1986 |
| Employees | 6000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 30+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Hong Kong Stock Exchange/Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 03800.HK/002506.SZ | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [http://www.gcltech.com/](http://www.gcltech.com/) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GCL | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 232 | 153 | +79 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 745 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 558 W | 547 W | +11 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GCL | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.50% | 24.00% | +0.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 21.82% | +0.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GCL | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.320%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 151 (65%) | 125 (82%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GCL | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.9%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 43 (18.5%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 73 (31.5%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (20.7%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 66 (28.4%) | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | GCL | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (2.6%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 60 (25.9%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 63 (27.2%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 81 (34.9%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 22 (9.5%) | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | GCL | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 108 (46.6%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| PERC | 102 (44.0%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| N-type | 10 (4.3%) | 0 |
| HJT | 7 (3.0%) | 48 (31.4%) |
| BIPV | 5 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Top panels, GCL


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF 725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725-1) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GCL-NH12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nh12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GCL is a Chinese manufacturer operating as GCL System Integration Technology (GCL-SI), a subsidiary of the GCL Group - one of the world's largest energy conglomerates, headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company built its foundations in polysilicon and wafer production before expanding aggressively into module manufacturing. GCL-SI recorded approximately 25 GW in module shipments in 2024 and operates module production capacity of around 30 GW per year. The company was previously recognized on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 manufacturer list, though its current standing on that list is not clearly confirmed by recent public sources. Risen Energy, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang province, has grown into a larger-scale manufacturer with reported production capacity exceeding 48 GW and cumulative shipments surpassing 114 GW. Risen holds confirmed Bloomberg Tier 1 status, carries an AAA credit rating, and has a documented track record of projects financed by independent commercial banks. On institutional bankability, Risen holds the stronger and better-documented position.

GCL-SI's current product lineup centers on the SiRo portfolio, which includes the SiRo T Series built on TOPCon 2.0 cell technology - suited to utility-scale ground-mount and industrial rooftop applications - and the SiRo B Series using a back-contact TOPCon architecture. The company has also moved into BIPV, floating solar, and agrivoltaic modules, and in 2025 commissioned a 1 GW perovskite module factory, placing it at the frontier of next-generation PV development. Risen Energy offers a broad portfolio spanning TOPCon and HJT (Heterojunction) technologies under its Hyper-ion product family. The flagship HJT Hyper-ion Pro module reached mass-production output of 740 W with module efficiency of approximately 24.8% as of mid-2025. Risen's range covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale use cases, with HJT modules being particularly well suited to high-temperature climates and space-constrained rooftops where energy density per square metre is critical.

For a typical international buyer, Risen is the safer default choice: it combines a clearly documented Tier 1 bankability record, a broad technology portfolio anchored by best-in-class HJT modules, and strong independent test performance recognized by PVEL across all seven scorecard categories. GCL-SI is a credible alternative - especially for buyers who value deep polysilicon supply chain integration or want exposure to perovskite tandem development - but its bankability documentation is less transparent for projects relying on non-recourse project finance. For residential and smaller C&I buyers who are less sensitive to bankability requirements, both brands represent competitive, cost-effective Chinese-manufactured options that are broadly comparable on price and core performance.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GCL vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [GCL vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [GCL vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.