---
title: "GCL vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare GCL vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# GCL vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 232 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. GCL leans bifacial (65% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | GCL | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou/Hong Kong | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1990 | 2006 |
| Employees | 6000+ | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity | 30+ GW/year | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Hong Kong Stock Exchange/Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 03800.HK/002506.SZ | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [http://www.gcltech.com/](http://www.gcltech.com/) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | GCL | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 232 | 637 | +405 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 558 W | 523 W | +36 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | GCL | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.50% | 24.80% | +0.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 22.18% | +0.15 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | GCL | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.320%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.016 |
| Bifacial Share | 151 (65%) | 231 (36%) | +29 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | GCL | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (0.9%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 43 (18.5%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 73 (31.5%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (20.7%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 66 (28.4%) | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | GCL | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (2.6%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 60 (25.9%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 63 (27.2%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 81 (34.9%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 22 (9.5%) | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | GCL | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 108 (46.6%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| PERC | 102 (44.0%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| N-type | 10 (4.3%) | 195 (30.6%) |
| HJT | 7 (3.0%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (2.2%) | 5 (0.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |


## Top panels, GCL


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF 725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725-1) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GCL-NH12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nh12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GCL, founded in 1990 and headquartered in China, is one of the solar industry's longer-established module manufacturers, with a stated production capacity exceeding 30 GW and a workforce of over 6,000 employees. Listed on both the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, GCL holds Tier 1 bankable status and offers a focused catalog of 205 panel models. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, has grown into the world's leading solar module supplier by shipment volume, with a production capacity of 130 GW, more than 33,800 employees, and a listing on the NYSE. Both are Tier 1 bankable, but Jinko Solar's scale - more than four times GCL's production capacity - combined with its position as a consistent global shipment leader gives it a clear advantage in supply security, logistical reach, and leverage in large-volume procurement negotiations.

Technologically, GCL's portfolio is led by PERC cells (36.1% of models), while Jinko Solar has moved further into next-generation n-type territory, with TOPCon technology representing 39.4% of its 545-model lineup. Jinko's maximum module efficiency reaches 24.8% versus GCL's 24.06%, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C outperforms GCL's -0.324%/°C, translating to better real-world output in warm operating conditions. A notable contrast lies in bifacial adoption: GCL's portfolio is 60.5% bifacial compared to 31.9% for Jinko, making GCL a strong fit for ground-mount utility-scale and commercial C&I projects where rear-side energy gain is a design priority. GCL also carries a higher average panel wattage of 551.8 Wp versus Jinko's 511.1 Wp, indicating a product mix weighted toward larger-format modules. Jinko, backed by 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer recognitions and a broad catalog, is well-suited to residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and international commercial tenders that require deep supply chain reliability.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk option for high-volume or diversified procurement - its greater production capacity, NYSE-listed transparency, wider technology range, and superior temperature coefficient make it versatile across project types and geographies. GCL presents a compelling case specifically for bifacial ground-mount projects, where its high bifacial share and larger average module size deliver a straightforward efficiency-per-area advantage. Both manufacturers carry comparable warranty terms of approximately 28 years and hold Tier 1 ratings, so the final decision hinges on technology preference, project typology, and the weight a buyer places on supplier scale and track record.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [GCL vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [GCL vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [GCL vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gcl-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.