---
title: "Gamko New Energy vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gamko New Energy vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Gamko New Energy vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 255 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nantong, Jiangsu | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 1997 |
| Employees | 201-300 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.gamkosolar.com](http://www.gamkosolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 255 | 340 | +85 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 760 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 500 W | 520 W | +20 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.14% | 24.80% | +0.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 21.71% | +0.32 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.332%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 207 (81%) | 145 (43%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 9 (3.5%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 64 (25.1%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 46 (18.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (13.7%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 101 (39.6%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 47 (18.4%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 71 (27.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 79 (31.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (16.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 16 (6.3%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (57%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Gamko New Energy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 146 (57.3%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 106 (41.6%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Flexible | 3 (1.2%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Gamko New Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GKA210N132-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GKA210N132-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GKA210N132-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GKA210N132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GKA210N132-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar and Gamko New Energy are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global photovoltaics market. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 and has grown into one of the world's top-tier PV manufacturers, holding BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status consistently - including under the tightened Q2 2025 criteria - and reporting cumulative shipments exceeding 292 GW across more than 100 countries. Gamko New Energy, founded in 2008 and headquartered in Nantong, is a significantly smaller producer with 201-300 employees, an annual production capacity of 1.2 GW, and no confirmed BNEF bankability rating. In terms of cell technology, Trina Solar's portfolio is dominated by TOPCon modules (69.84% of its lineup), reflecting an industry-leading shift toward next-generation n-type silicon. Gamko's portfolio, by contrast, is still majority PERC (50.98%), though bifacial construction is central to its offering - 81.18% of its modules are bifacial, compared to just 39.02% for Trina Solar. Peak efficiency ratings are nearly identical (Gamko 24.14%, Trina 24.1%), while Gamko holds a slight edge in average portfolio efficiency (22.06% vs. 21.51%). However, Trina Solar's average temperature coefficient of Pmax (-0.304%/°C) is meaningfully better than Gamko's (-0.332%/°C), an advantage that matters in warm climates or during summer peaks.

Trina Solar is the natural choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bankability, project financing eligibility, and supply chain reliability are non-negotiable. Its Vertex N i-TOPCon modules are actively deployed in large European solar farms and are well-supported by an established distribution and service network. Gamko New Energy's strength lies in its bifacial-heavy portfolio and its 30-year average warranty - slightly longer than Trina's 28.15-year average - making it an interesting option for residential rooftop installs or smaller ground-mount systems where the customer prioritizes long-term output guarantees and can benefit from bifacial energy gains on reflective surfaces.

For international buyers evaluating these two manufacturers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk choice for any project requiring third-party financing or institutional-grade bankability. Gamko New Energy may suit buyers seeking high bifacial penetration and extended warranty terms at a potentially lower price point, though its limited global track record and absence from Tier 1 lists mean it is better suited to self-financed or smaller-scale deployments where procurement flexibility outweighs brand recognition.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Gamko New Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.