---
title: "Gamko New Energy vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gamko New Energy vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-q-cells"
---

# Gamko New Energy vs Q-Cells

Gamko New Energy has the broader catalog (255 vs 89 models). Gamko New Energy leads on peak efficiency at 24.14%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Nantong, Jiangsu | Seoul |
| Founded | 2008 | 1999 |
| Employees | 201-300 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 1.2 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [http://www.gamkosolar.com](http://www.gamkosolar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 255 | 89 | +166 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 675 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 500 W | 468 W | +32 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.14% | 23.20% | +0.94 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 21.21% | +0.81 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.332%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 207 (81%) | 35 (39%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 9 (3.5%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 64 (25.1%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 46 (18.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (13.7%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 101 (39.6%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Gamko New Energy offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 47 (18.4%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 71 (27.8%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 79 (31.0%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (16.5%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 16 (6.3%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (57%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Gamko New Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 146 (57.3%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 106 (41.6%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| Flexible | 3 (1.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Gamko New Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GKA210N132-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GKA210N132-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GKA210N132-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GKA210N132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GKA210N132-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Gamko New Energy is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Nantong, founded in 2017. According to the company's own disclosures and ENF Solar data, its annual production capacity reached 1.2 GW as of 2023. The company holds standard industry certifications including IEC 61215, IEC 61730, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001, but does not appear on any publicly available Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 list or major bankability registry. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, traces its origins to Germany in 1999 and was acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012. Today it operates a global module production capacity exceeding 11 GW per year, with an 8.4 GW manufacturing hub in Georgia, USA. Q CELLS holds confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and dual headquarters in Seoul and Thalheim, Germany. In terms of institutional footprint, Q CELLS holds a decisive advantage.

Gamko's product range spans monocrystalline PERC and TOPCon modules from a few watts up to above 750 W, including bifacial and flexible formats. The catalog is broad enough to serve off-grid, residential, and small commercial applications, and the company positions itself toward price-sensitive buyers and emerging-market procurement. Q CELLS focuses its commercial lineup on the Q.ANTUM NEO platform - a TOPCon-based cell architecture delivering module efficiencies up to approximately 22.5-23.7% in flagship series. Its product families address residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments, with particularly strong traction in European and North American markets where installers and project financiers frequently require Tier 1 status.

For most international buyers evaluating both brands, Q CELLS is the lower-risk default choice: it comes with documented bankability, widely available independent performance data, a recognised 25-year product warranty, and service infrastructure in key markets. Gamko can be a viable option in cost-driven procurement where price is the primary filter and the buyer can independently verify local service availability and warranty enforcement. The two brands are not meaningfully interchangeable - they serve overlapping end uses but occupy distinct positions in terms of institutional credibility and scale.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Gamko New Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.