---
title: "Gamko New Energy vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gamko New Energy vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Gamko New Energy vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 255 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nantong, Jiangsu | Beijing |
| Founded | 2008 | 2005 |
| Employees | 201-300 | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity | 1.2 GW/year | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website | [http://www.gamkosolar.com](http://www.gamkosolar.com) | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 255 | 504 | +249 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 500 W | 456 W | +44 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.14% | 24.80% | +0.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 21.13% | +0.89 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.332%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.010 |
| Bifacial Share | 207 (81%) | 238 (47%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 9 (3.5%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 20-21% | 64 (25.1%) | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 46 (18.0%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (13.7%) | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 101 (39.6%) | 74 (14.7%) |


## Power distribution

Gamko New Energy offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 47 (18.4%) | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 71 (27.8%) | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 79 (31.0%) | 120 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (16.5%) | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 16 (6.3%) | 9 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (57%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Gamko New Energy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 146 (57.3%) | 146 (29.0%) |
| PERC | 106 (41.6%) | 247 (49.0%) |
| Flexible | 3 (1.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 90 (17.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 16 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (1.0%) |


## Top panels, Gamko New Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GKA210N132-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GKA210N132-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GKA210N132-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GKA210N132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GKA210N132-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Gamko New Energy and JA Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global PV industry. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, is one of the world's largest module producers, with a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW per year and a workforce of over 37,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status from BloombergNEF for over a decade and from S&P Global Commodity Insights, and jointly claimed the top rank in Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for H1 2025. It is actively present in Europe including Poland. Gamko New Energy, established in 2008 and headquartered in Nantong, operates on a considerably smaller scale - with a reported annual capacity of 1.2 GW and a team of 201-300 employees - and does not appear on major Tier 1 bankability lists.

Both manufacturers anchor their respective portfolios in PERC cell technology (approximately 51-52% of panels each), with JA Solar expanding into TOPCon through its Deep Blue series and Gamko supplementing its offer with TOPCon models as well. Gamko's catalog of 255 panels delivers a higher average module power of 500 Wp and a notably high bifacial share of 81.18%, making its products well-suited for residential rooftop installations on pitched south-facing roofs and small-to-medium commercial C&I projects where power density is a priority. The 30-year product warranty is a strong selling point for end customers. JA Solar's broader catalog of 524 panels, combined with its Tier 1 status and a temperature coefficient of -0.323%/°C (marginally better than Gamko's -0.332%/°C), makes it the standard choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and bank-financed commercial installations. JA Solar's average efficiency of 20.87% trails Gamko's 22.06%, partly reflecting the weight of older PERC models still present across its wide portfolio.

For international buyers - developers, EPCs, or large-scale installers - JA Solar's bankability credentials, global supply chain depth, and proven long-term reliability record make it the lower-risk selection, particularly where project financing or insurance requirements mandate Tier 1 status. Gamko New Energy can be a competitive option for price-sensitive residential installers or distributors who prioritize high bifaciality and a full 30-year product warranty, but its limited global footprint and absence from bankability rankings make it less suitable for projects where the manufacturer's financial resilience is a key underwriting consideration.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Gamko New Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.