---
title: "Gamko New Energy vs HT-SAAE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Gamko New Energy vs HT-SAAE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-ht-saae"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/gamko-new-energy/ht-saae.png"
---

# Gamko New Energy vs HT-SAAE

Gamko New Energy has the broader catalog (255 vs 112 models). Gamko New Energy leads on peak efficiency at 24.14%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nantong, Jiangsu | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2008 | 1998 |
| Employees | 201-300 | 500+ |
| Annual capacity | 1.2 GW/year | 2+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH |
| Website | [http://www.gamkosolar.com](http://www.gamkosolar.com) | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) |

Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.

HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 255 | 112 | +143 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 715 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 500 W | 470 W | +30 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.14% | 23.90% | +0.24 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.03% | 20.47% | +1.56 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.332%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.010 |
| Bifacial Share | 207 (81%) | 53 (47%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 9 (3.5%) | 30 (26.8%) |
| 20-21% | 64 (25.1%) | 4 (3.6%) |
| 21-22% | 46 (18.0%) | 12 (10.7%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (13.7%) | 39 (34.8%) |
| 23%+ | 101 (39.6%) | 27 (24.1%) |


## Power distribution

Gamko New Energy offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 47 (18.4%) | 30 (26.8%) |
| 400-499W | 71 (27.8%) | 33 (29.5%) |
| 500-599W | 79 (31.0%) | 29 (25.9%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (16.5%) | 16 (14.3%) |
| 700W+ | 16 (6.3%) | 4 (3.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (57%)

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (79%)


| Technology | Gamko New Energy | HT-SAAE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 146 (57.3%) | 88 (78.6%) |
| PERC | 106 (41.6%) | 19 (17.0%) |
| Flexible | 3 (1.2%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 5 (4.5%) |


## Top panels, Gamko New Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GKA210N132-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GKA210N132-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GKA210N132-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GKA210N132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GKA210N132-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, HT-SAAE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

HT-SAAE, formally Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd., traces its origins to 1956 as part of China's state-owned aerospace conglomerate CASC, and began transferring space-grade solar technology to terrestrial commercial applications in 2000. BloombergNEF has consistently placed HT-SAAE on its Tier 1 solar module list, ranking it among the top Chinese PV suppliers in terms of bankability. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Shanghai, Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, and Turkey, with the Turkish plant alone reporting an annual capacity of up to 2 GW. Gamko New Energy, by contrast, is a more recently established manufacturer headquartered in Nantong, Jiangsu, founded around 2008, with a reported annual capacity of approximately 1.2 GW as of 2023. No independent industry sources confirm Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability status for Gamko. On institutional footprint, HT-SAAE holds a decisive advantage.

HT-SAAE's commercial product range is built around N-type TOPCon and P-type PERC modules using half-cut cell architecture, with bifacial variants well documented across independent testing platforms. Its N-type panels appeared on the PVEL PV Top Performers 2024 list across all seven stress-test categories, providing installers and project financiers with objective third-party validation. The brand is reviewed on established platforms including SolarQuotes, EnergySage, and Solar Choice, with efficiency figures for N-type models cited in the range of 21 to 24 percent. Gamko's catalog spans a wide wattage range from small residential panels up to formats exceeding 800 W, incorporating TOPCon and PERC technology as stated by the manufacturer, along with flexible and bifacial options. Certifications including IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 are listed, and the company markets itself for both on-grid residential and export-focused commercial projects, though independent field reviews are sparse.

For most international buyers - particularly those financing utility-scale or commercial projects where lender due diligence applies - HT-SAAE is the lower-risk choice given its confirmed Tier 1 standing, aerospace heritage, and independently verified performance data. Gamko is best positioned as a budget-oriented option for price-sensitive projects where institutional bankability requirements are less strict. The two brands are not interchangeable for financed or large-scale deployments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Gamko New Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ht-saae)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ht-saae)
- [Gamko New Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ht-saae)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/gamko-new-energy-vs-ht-saae

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.