---
title: "FoxESS vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare FoxESS vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/foxess-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# FoxESS vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | FoxESS | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Wenzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2019 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.fox-ess.com](https://www.fox-ess.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

FoxESS is a global leader in inverter and energy storage solutions, backed by the Fortune Global 500 Tsingshan Group. The company specializes in hybrid inverters, lithium battery storage systems, and smart energy management platforms for residential and commercial applications. With operations in over 70 countries and...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | FoxESS | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | FoxESS | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | FoxESS | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | FoxESS | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | FoxESS | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | FoxESS | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

FoxESS and Jinko Solar are both Chinese companies active in the renewable energy sector, but they occupy fundamentally different market niches and should not be compared as panel-for-panel competitors. FoxESS was founded in 2019 in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, and is exclusively a manufacturer of solar inverters and battery energy storage systems - it does not produce solar panels, which is reflected in a panel count of zero in any PV module database. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW per year and a workforce exceeding 33,800 employees. Both companies hold Tier 1 - bankable status, though Jinko's NYSE listing provides an additional layer of financial transparency and accountability for international project finance.

FoxESS has built a strong reputation in the hybrid inverter and energy storage space, claiming over 35% market share in the UK inverter segment and ranking second globally for residential energy storage shipments. Its product line covers single- and three-phase hybrid inverters from 0.7 to 25 kW, making it well suited for residential rooftop installs with battery integration and small commercial C&I projects. Jinko Solar, by contrast, offers a deep panel portfolio of 545 modules, with TOPCon technology representing approximately 39% of its range. Key performance figures from the portfolio include a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, an average power output of around 511 Wp, and a maximum module power of 735 Wp. Jinko set a verified world record for n-type TOPCon cell efficiency at 27.79% in late 2025, confirmed by Germany's ISFH laboratory, and has been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years. Its modules serve residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount deployments across global markets.

For an international buyer or developer choosing between the two, the comparison is ultimately a category mismatch: FoxESS is an inverter and storage solution, while Jinko Solar is a module supplier. Procurement teams building a full system would evaluate both independently - Jinko for the module selection, and FoxESS as one inverter-storage option among several. Where Jinko Solar stands out purely on the module side is its combination of broad wattage range, proven TOPCon efficiency, competitive degradation rates, and long-standing bankability - attributes that make it a low-risk choice for project finance in utility-scale and commercial segments alike.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [FoxESS vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/foxess-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [FoxESS vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/foxess-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [FoxESS vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/foxess-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/foxess-vs-jinko-solar